there really isn't - there is a lot of evidence that suggests its a fundamental limit of the universe.
AI? Aye aye! *
- Thread starter [FnG]magnolia
- Start date
Question of this millisecond.
www.theguardian.com
Nah, not really, who cares.
Can AIs suffer? Big tech and users grapple with one of most unsettling questions of our times
As first AI-led rights advocacy group is founded, industry is divided on whether models are, or can be, sentient
www.theguardian.com
Nah, not really, who cares.
i agree with Mustafa Suleyman - its ludicrous to suggest AI is, or even will be, conscious.Question of this millisecond.
Can AIs suffer? Big tech and users grapple with one of most unsettling questions of our times
As first AI-led rights advocacy group is founded, industry is divided on whether models are, or can be, sentient
Nah, not really, who cares.
Its like saying your calculator is because its good at maths.
Question of this millisecond.
Can AIs suffer? Big tech and users grapple with one of most unsettling questions of our times
As first AI-led rights advocacy group is founded, industry is divided on whether models are, or can be, sentient
Nah, not really, who cares.
If they do decide that AI suffers, then all those poor engineers that manually suffered before may make some noise..
Sorry no, you clearly did not understand my post. What is evidence now many not be evidence in the future. We are all bound by our current and past knowledge. There are plenty of examples of theories that were thought to be true later proven incorrect.
Each generation is limited to the knowledge of current and past generations.
Last edited:
How can anyone be in £57k worth of uni debt?!
Back in 2003 or when ever i was in uni, i took out 3k for the first two years and nothing on the 3rd year
and I had a part time job!
I guess if you take out 57k and used it for a house deposit, it may seem sensible? maybe ? however, i bet most people spend it on booze and hookers
Back in 2003 or when ever i was in uni, i took out 3k for the first two years and nothing on the 3rd year
and I had a part time job!
I guess if you take out 57k and used it for a house deposit, it may seem sensible? maybe ? however, i bet most people spend it on booze and hookers
Last edited:
Tuition fees have kinda increased since 2003… Depending on the course someone was on and how much interest has piled up since then, £57k isn’t that hard to believe.
The system is properly broken.
Alright, I’ll take that bet.
!remindme 6 years
Do you have any idea how long it takes to build a nuclear reactor on earth? Or how hard it is to send literally anything at all to the moon? You are on crack if you think they are building a nuclear reactor on the moon in 6 years.
Last edited:
this is nonsense and not how science works - just because some theories in the past have been proven false doesn't mean that any theory can also be proven false (or broken).
Fees are a lot higher now than 20+ years ago.
Think it's £9k a year.
Throw on 3 years of accommodation and living expenses and that's easily £57k
Mini reactors: SMRs can take between 12 to 30 months to build, microreactors take even less time.
They can be build anywhere they have been used in military bases and remote areas. Gen IV reactors and TWR are being designed for even faster deployment. A..I are being used to build faster reactors.
Last edited:
6 years. Not gonna happen.
And the millionaires leaving the country complain that they don't have anyone to fill the roles..
There's even a mini reactor in one of the US universities in the middle of a populated city. It's been there for years and the students use it.
We'll see. If it can even do some of what you laid out it will be extremely impressive.
They'll love AI, I bet they can't wait to replace large swathes of their workforce.
They do have people to fill roles. They just don't want to pay them what they deserve or require, because said millionaires want to make sure they keep becoming wealthier and wealthier until they have more money than they know what to do with and can live excessively lavish lives, and in absurdly disproportionate luxury.
They want to continue the obscene and sick practice of being able to do things like spend £1000+ a night in a hotel or hundreds of pounds every night on dumbass bottles of champagne.
Last edited: