Eh?
"Vast majority" is not equal to "all".
The X99 series and similar didn't have IGPUS as afar as I recall.
Also one of the reasons I run an X5650.
Not all Zen chips will be APU’s either.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Eh?
"Vast majority" is not equal to "all".
The X99 series and similar didn't have IGPUS as afar as I recall.
Also one of the reasons I run an X5650.
While you are right that's never going to happen, and you never want to hang a secondary monitor off the iGP or diagnose a board of graphic card, what about if Intel's idea of running some post processing stuff or upscaler on the integrated takes off?Now if someone brings out a cpu with an IGPU equivalent to a current mid-range discrete graphics card like a 3070, then colour me interested, but that's never going to happen.
While you are right that's never going to happen, and you never want to hang a secondary monitor off the iGP or diagnose a board of graphic card, what about if Intel's idea of running some post processing stuff or upscaler on the integrated takes off?
Sometimes like could benefit everyone who was an integrated GPU in their CPU.
While you are right that's never going to happen, and you never want to hang a secondary monitor off the iGP or diagnose a board of graphic card, what about if Intel's idea of running some post processing stuff or upscaler on the integrated takes off?
Sometimes like could benefit everyone who was an integrated GPU in their CPU.
This can be true in laptops if it has a limited power envelope for both CPU/GPU, I seem to remember that being an issue with AMD APUs prior to Ryzen, but using the IGP in a modern desktop CPU doesn't impact responsiveness. I guess it might if we're talking multiple monitors and high refresh rates, but on an average desktop? No. I've used exactly the same systems with dGPU and Intel IGPs and there's no difference.I don't recommend using an iGPU for anything - it is slow and stresses the central cores to the extent that the overall system responsiveness goes to crap.
Tsmc is taking the **** now
they've just issued another 10% wafer price increase notice for 7nm, 6nm, 5nm and 3nm.
if memory serves me right that means tsmc has increased its wafer prices by 40% since February 2020
Guess the cost of American semiconductor protectionism is not only going to be felt by American customers, then!I believe that’s only for new contracts and TSMC have to build a new line of US fabs for Apple and Intel.
Guess the cost of American semiconductor protectionism is not only going to be felt by American customers, then!
The real question is 10% or 40% of what?
Accurate TSMC wafer prices are hardly out on the open, and most customers probably get lots discount for certain things making them totally opaque for us.
Well, any spare money they'd rather give to their shareholders via sharebuyback, and let the government indulge them with corporate welfare.You’d think Intel with its trillions of dollars would do the decent thing and start it’s own fabs like the other capitalist silicon companies in China do.
Well, any spare money they'd rather give to their shareholders via sharebuyback, and let the government indulge them with corporate welfare.
They are simply too big to fail. And what better way to fail upward than to become another Boeing always able to rely on monies from the DoD?
And remember kids:
Social Welfare is bad and anti-American.
Corporate Welfare is the greatest thing ever.
Having said all that, the first DoD corporate welfare cheque is pretty small
Intel Foundry Services gets a boost from $100M Pentagon award for US-made chips
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...t-from-100m-pentagon-award-for-us-made-chips/
That's pocket change!
The US goverment asked TSMC to move it's advanced node production facilities to the US to get away from China.
The Taiwan government refused to let TSMC go because they want TSMC as leverage.
So the US government instead will pump money into Intel to ensure that if China invades Taiwan, the US still has access to advanced process nodes
The biggest concern for the US in that region is that TSMC is either bombed and destroyed by China or not destroyed, China takes over production and immediately refuses to sell chips to the West
The US goverment asked TSMC to move it's advanced node production facilities to the US to get away from China.
The Taiwan government refused to let TSMC go because they want TSMC as leverage.
So the US government instead will pump money into Intel to ensure that if China invades Taiwan, the US still has access to advanced process nodes
The biggest concern for the US in that region is that TSMC is either bombed and destroyed by China or not destroyed, China takes over production and immediately refuses to sell chips to the West
Intel are apparently trying to scupper the deal.
It wouldn't surprise me, just think, no competition from TSMC, it gives them the monopoly and as an added bonus their arch-rival has to come crawling to them bowl in hands.
Apparently Intel are upset TSMC are setting up in the same state and the US Congress is offering support.
Oh no, competition, can't have that, make them stop congress.
Intel are feeble and pathetic.
Intel have to take some responsibility for the silicon shortage issue. They have been woeful at getting a steady from their own fabs and have fully equipped plants that have never produced a single chip, while buying up swathes of TSMC supply.