Skywalker said:
Handling for one , you wont find a better handling car this size thats front wheel drive and non turbo ,
You won't find a better handling FWD car than a Honda Accord? I think the millions of 106 GTi, Mitsubishi FTO and Honda Integra owners out there will be along in a second to explain just how wrong that is.
I cannot put my hand on my heart and say the ST200 is the better handling car as I've not driven the Accord in Type R form but I would be suprised if it's noticeably better and not suprised if it isn't as good as a 200.
0-60 is 6.1 not 6.5 , The st200 looks like hundreds of millions of other mondeos
What, and the Accord doesn't look like hundreds of millions of other Accords? All it has to make it stand out from the crowed is a huge wing on the back. No noticebaly different bodykit etc. The Mondeo has the bodykit, which makes it noticeably better than a regular car (Although yes, the same kit is found on other cars in the range) and the unique Imperial Blue paintwork.
Yup, the Mondeo has full Recaro leather seats.
out live a mondeo , more reliable.
Out live a Mondeo? Neither car is reknowned for falling apart - both are very good cars and reliable. You'll get bored of both long before either show signs of ever even starting to fall apart.
Cost wise they are more expensive because at the end of the day there not a rep car with hundreds on the road
Are you actually sitting there with a straight face trying to tell me that the Honda Accord is *not* a 'rep car with hundreds on the road'? Surely not?
Both cars are from the SAME class - they are BOTH based on rep cars. Sorry.
It's quite funny how a few months ago you liked the Mondeo and were looking for an ST24 to buy but now you have a Honda Accord they are apparently rubbish. Yea, ok. Take the fanboy glasses off please