Big.Wayne said:Hi again all,
still waiting for my shipment of 170's, been an interesting few days!
I have concluded that this 408L hysteria is just hype! It is a phenomena that exists only in the overclockers.co.uk forums.
I have spent many many days trawling the overclocking forums of the world, and it seems most hardcore overclockers are dealing with batches and steppings. Getting down to microscopic details such as the specific wafer-charge (in this example it's 408L) is just a step too far and I believe any claims that is a super-uber chip are unfounded. People may have clocked them very high but from the evidence that has been shown I believe these overclocks are *far* from stable.
My only mistake here was believing some of the claims that have been made so far, and I really wish some people would take more time to test for *super* stability before rushing to make a post
hehe this is the sort of misleading post that I am talking about
Lastly I have managed to sell at least four 170's to clients and working on the rest now, by not buying them from overclockers.co.uk I stand to be at least £500 better off, maybe more. . .
Huh? no I was just grumbling about lack of screenshots, its so easy to say an overclock is stable/solid/rock etc but if you have a good look around the forums you will see not a heap to back it up. I'm not saying anyone is lying, just mistaken.
In this one thread for example, the evidence of stability is very thin, probably the best screenie was supplied by mercyless, showing a completed cycle of S&M, but the other few are simple 32mb super PI, or a 3D-Mark loop, bits and pieces.
As someone who is interested in overclocking, I would like to see a whole desktop picture showing everything possible, 12-24hour loops of primes, cpu-z pages showing CPu results, finished 32MB super-PI runs, S&M, OCCT etc etc.
Also I would like to see the temps from the whole period of the test (high-low) voltages, etc
As much as you can cram into a screenshot basically
Last edited: