milkinc13 said:Simple reason I'm not asking for conroe is that I don't like Intel, i had a P3 and the performance was totally rubbish, so that has turned me away from Intel. Currently i've got an Athlon 64 3000+ & it's brill, it does what I want. If AMD still had the best performance what would you tell me to get AMD or Intel. Just because Intel have the faster this and that at the mo, doesn't mean that AMD isn't good. I've had 2 AMD systems out of the 4 computers that i've had. (1 was an IBM computer, so i'm guessing it had an IBM processor, and the P3) and the performance has been good for what I want. So i'm sticking with what I know.
Totally agree.easyrider said:Mate my last system was a AMD opty 170 dual core running at FX 62 speeds.
I loved it.
However I upgraded to conroe and the conroes thrashes it in every dept.Not by a bit but by a huge ammount.
How does 1025 FPS in DVD shrink analysis grab you?
My opty managed around 500
Conroe is that good and that fast.
You should get what the fastest is at the time and for the cost.
Conroe 6300 cannot be beaten for 125 quid.
You should not out do yourself based on company loyalty.I don't care who makes what I want the fastest for my money and you should to.
If you get AM2 dont moan as we have told you so.
Durzel said:Totally agree.
If you buy a CPU (or anything in fact) purely based on some misguided loyalty for a faceless corporation that couldn't give a crap about you then you're an idiot.
If you're buying a new motherboard and memory - Conroe is a no-brainer.
milkinc13 said:I hear what you are all saying, but I'm not one for the fastest processor, I buy what i see I need with some overheads for a bit of future proofing. Also i'm spending my money on what I want. Give it a few months to a year and AMD will have the edge over Intel, then u'll all be saying go for an AMD over Intel. I don't use the computer for ripping video and encoding it as I don't need to, the only encoding I do is for MP3's to WMA's to allow extra space on my MP3 player. Yes I like speed on my games, but most of that is from the graphics card as that needs to encode all of the images.
But you haven't offered any advice relevant to his question, the thread has just been dumped on like pretty much every AM2 thread that pops up.Durzel said:No point really offering advice in the face of that logic really.
Do you now how CPU limited modern games are?
Your reasons are all wrong and you will be wasting your money. You have asked for advice and yet you refuse based on flawed arguements and misinfromed choices.
We're trying to do him a favour. It's no skin off my nose what he buys - he can blow £700+ on an FX-62 if he wants to, his perogative. Doesn't stop me thinking he's wasting his money, and if he's asking for opinions on a public forum about "what to buy" then he should expect contrasting opinions.Kamakazie! said:It's the same people in every AM2 thread that can't just answer the posters question. It always has to turn in to an Intel love fest. Can't you just leave the poor guy alone or offer him some info related to what he wants?
Kamakazie! said:Can't people just offer relevant advice to someone who is asking for it?
Why do people see the need to enter the full blown "GET THE INTEL ITS THE BESTEST" debate over and over again.
If the guy is not overclocking then the 6300 offers LITTLE over the 3800+ especially considdering the guy is not going to be doing much encoding. Did any of you ask if he was going to be overclocking? Errr.... no!
He wants a bit of future proofing, the AM2 motherboard should last him well in to 2008 with new processor upgrades. Can't say that Intel has confirmed this so i don't know what it will be like with a DS3.
If you want overall low power consumption for a computer that is on most of the day, the 3800+ will consume less than the 6300. At full load the 6300 sucks less power but pretty much any other time and especially at idle the 3800+ uses much less power. Lets face it, a computer on 24/7 is probably going to be at idle far more often than full load!
There are plenty of Intel users here who ONLY buy Intel. Regardless that AMD has been king for the last few years. If this guy wants to buy an AMD because it is an AMD then that is his choice. It is his money. Regardless that as i mentioned above, there may be other reasons for him to go AMD currently.
_________________________________________________
As for answering the original question. Get a 3800+ as it is stupidly good value for money, regardless of the 6300. At stock its a close race in performance/£.
Motherboard wise.... well i have solely looked at Crossfire motherboards because i want as low power consumption as possible with as high performance. I am going for the MSI K9A Platinum. The other option was an Asus something or other but after plenty of good reviews regarding the MSI then i plumped for that one.
For nForce 5 mobo's.... well Asus has some very good ones out that i have seen reviews (The Crosshair and some other). There are loads to be honest. My main advice, look for some reviews and decide on a few boards that you like the look of. Then ask back here with the specifics.
But you haven't offered any advice relevant to his question, the thread has just been dumped on like pretty much every AM2 thread that pops up.
Are you having a laugh? Most modern games are totally GPU limited at any decent resolution.
There is nothing wrong with his reasons, it is his money. Why will he be wasting it? As i have listed above, there are quite a few reasons why a 3800+ is a perfectly good choice, if not a better one.
He hasn't asked for any advice about getting a Conroe, which is the advice you have offered. If you offered adivce relating to his actual question then he probably would be more willing to accept it.
It's the same people in every AM2 thread that can't just answer the posters question. It always has to turn in to an Intel love fest. Can't you just leave the poor guy alone or offer him some info related to what he wants?
He was asking what AM2 mobo/processor to buy. Not wether to buy a Conroe or AM2. If he wanted that there are already plenty of threads that cover basically all of the bases.Durzel said:We're trying to do him a favour. It's no skin off my nose what he buys - he can blow £700+ on an FX-62 if he wants to, his perogative. Doesn't stop me thinking he's wasting his money, and if he's asking for opinions on a public forum about "what to buy" then he should expect contrasting opinions.
I can say it because AMD have confirmed that their next generation of processor based around socket AM3 will be backwards compatible with socket AM2 and DDR2 (aswell as AM3 and DDR3).Durzel said:How can you say that a motherboard will last him well into 2008? I would dispute that, even from an Intel perspective. We will have DDR3 DIMMs by then for a start, as well as any number of other feasible technology upgrades. Who's to say that PCI-e won't be replaced, or upgraded by then?
Durzel said:The bottom line is that if he is after the best performance RIGHT NOW, and is upgrading his motherboard and memory at the same time - then pound for pound Conroe is still the better option, whether he's overclocking or not. That's not "Intel fanboyism" or whatever you'd like to believe, it's fact. I couldn't give a crap who made Conroe - AMD, Intel, Microsoft or whoever - it's the best bang for buck.
Though i think the cheaper pricing of the 3800+ makes it a very tempting prospect.Anandtech said:The processor landscape has been changed once more thanks to AMD's extremely aggressive price cuts. The Core 2 Duo E6300 is a better performer than the X2 3800+ but is also more expensive, thankfully for the E6300's sake it is also faster than the 4200+ and the 4600+ in some benchmarks. Overall the E6300 is a better buy, but at stock speeds the advantage isn't nearly as great as the faster Core 2 parts. In many benchmarks the X2 4200+ isn't that far off the E6300's performance, sometimes even outperforming it at virtually the same price. Overclocking changes everything though, as our 2.592GHz E6300 ended up faster than AMD's FX-62 in almost every single benchmark. If you're not an overclocker, then the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ looks to be a competitive alternative to the Core 2 E6300.
Kamakazie! said:Can't people just offer relevant advice to someone who is asking for it?
Why do people see the need to enter the full blown "GET THE INTEL ITS THE BESTEST" debate over and over again.?
If the guy is not overclocking then the 6300 offers LITTLE over the 3800+ especially considdering the guy is not going to be doing much encoding. Did any of you ask if he was going to be overclocking? Errr.... no!
He wants a bit of future proofing, the AM2 motherboard should last him well in to 2008 with new processor upgrades. Can't say that Intel has confirmed this so i don't know what it will be like with a DS3.
If you want overall low power consumption for a computer that is on most of the day, the 3800+ will consume less than the 6300. At full load the 6300 sucks less power but pretty much any other time and especially at idle the 3800+ uses much less power. Lets face it, a computer on 24/7 is probably going to be at idle far more often than full load!
There are plenty of Intel users here who ONLY buy Intel. Regardless that AMD has been king for the last few years. If this guy wants to buy an AMD because it is an AMD then that is his choice. It is his money. Regardless that as i mentioned above, there may be other reasons for him to go AMD currently.
As for answering the original question. Get a 3800+ as it is stupidly good value for money, regardless of the 6300. At stock its a close race in performance/£.
Motherboard wise.... well i have solely looked at Crossfire motherboards because i want as low power consumption as possible with as high performance. I am going for the MSI K9A Platinum. The other option was an Asus something or other but after plenty of good reviews regarding the MSI then i plumped for that one.
For nForce 5 mobo's.... well Asus has some very good ones out that i have seen reviews (The Crosshair and some other). There are loads to be honest. My main advice, look for some reviews and decide on a few boards that you like the look of. Then ask back here with the specifics.
Are you having a laugh? Most modern games are totally GPU limited at any decent resolution.
There is nothing wrong with his reasons, it is his money. Why will he be wasting it? As i have listed above, there are quite a few reasons why a 3800+ is a perfectly good choice, if not a better one.
He hasn't asked for any advice about getting a Conroe, which is the advice you have offered. If you offered adivce relating to his actual question then he probably would be more willing to accept it.
It's the same people in every AM2 thread that can't just answer the posters question. It always has to turn in to an Intel love fest. Can't you just leave the poor guy alone or offer him some info related to what he wants?
milkinc13 said:Thank you Kamakazie!, you are the only person that has read what I want and not jumped on the "Get Conroe" boat. Thank you.