• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

I've not seen Linus' vid on it, but I've seen similar testing and the average framerates don't change much... But the 1% and 0.1% lows are vastly improved; they matter more than some folk seem to think.

Does Linus' vid not support that?
It seems, in his video, they don't see any significant difference in 1% lows in actual gaming resolutions (1440p and higher with RTX 4090) between 5800x3D, 7800x3D and newest 9800x3D. Either of these 3 is just fine and within at most few FPS difference from each other. Edge cases happen where newest is considerably better, but these are just 1080p edge cases. In productivity it's still mostly below 9700x. In other words, it's an expensive fastest gaming CPU that is really not needed for most people that play in 1440p or higher - much better option to buy faster GPU than invest into this CPU, as 9700x is considerably cheaper and good enough in games, with dropped price.
 
Last edited:
It is an awesome chip the 9800x3d but i like what Linus has done in his review, where he has shown it at 1440p with high graphical settings and there is next to no difference as usual from a 5800x3d to the 9800x3d in gaming.. i think a lot of people think they are going to see a jump at 1440p and 4k and be disappointed.
That's quite interesting
 
That's quite interesting
It's mostly that current modern CPUs and all the 3D cache ones, are fast enough when new games hammer GPUs mostly (yes, for RT fast CPU still needed but no need to get the fastest one there is). I can also see in tests that overclocking these CPUs hardly changes anything even in 1080p (2-3% for 20% more power use is a big NO to me).
 
Last edited:
I've not seen Linus' vid on it, but I've seen similar testing and the average framerates don't change much... But the 1% and 0.1% lows are vastly improved; they matter more than some folk seem to think.

Does Linus' vid not support that?
Nope, although it is a limited amount of games but at 1440p and 4K the 1% lows are near identical
 
I'll definitely be getting one. I just ordered an MSI MAG X870 Tomahawk WIFI, 32GB Corsair Vengeance 6000mhz cl30 and a 2TB Samsung 990 Pro. It'll be a nice upgrade from my 5900X setup.
 
Excuse my ignorance, but why test at 1080p with this CPU?
At this price point and with the other highend (ish) hardware that most will have alongside it, what's the point?

It's an extremely abused form of testing where games are the programs used to benchmark cpus.

Thing is, once the graphical load becomes significant then the cpu becomes almost irrelevant, every modern cpu will be twiddling its thumbs waiting for the graphics card to draw the frames and thus all get the same frames per second.

It is benchmarking for the sake of benchmarking and it won't get changed because as above, it has to be low res, low graphics or you can't see the differences.

But you know what, for the people who are actually using 1080p and low graphics, it's a true reflection of the gaming performance they'll get... with a 9800X3D and a 4090...
 
Last edited:
The performance differences are MASSIVE in many cases (20-30%+ in cases where you're already <100 fps so performance is very much still needed) vs even 7800X3D/14900K, and there's genuine tuning room there for OC, + Direct Die is looking very juicy (check derbauer's vid). Lots of cope in here around resolution, as if you'd be rendering with 8.3M pixels (4K) and <60 fps instead of cranking up DLSS and enjoying >120 - LOL, gimme a break. :rolleyes:
 
I've not seen Linus' vid on it, but I've seen similar testing and the average framerates don't change much... But the 1% and 0.1% lows are vastly improved; they matter more than some folk seem to think.

Does Linus' vid not support that?
Most important factor to me when gaming at 4k... the occasional stutter can ruin some games imo.
 
Very impressive results, but I still can't really justify upgrading my 5800X3D. Especially when I'm looking to move to a 4K monitor soon and don't really play any new AAA games.
 
The power and temps don't add up on TechPowerup.
Gaming power and gaming temps:
7800X3D 46W 69.2C
9800X3D 65W 60.8C

"Temperature testing on this page uses air-cooling, for consistency and to show comparable results. All performance testing on the other pages is done using an Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer III liquid cooling solution that keeps temperatures well below all limits, to ensure there is no thermal throttling."

edit: ok LTT review explains, more power draw but better temps. I have some reading/watching to do :)

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom