• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD teasing new product, is it Radeon or FirePro?

What i dont get is why nvidia came in with such a low price on the 970, lets face it even the most hardcore nvidia fanboy would have to admit its a bit of a shocker
 
Pills?

nR0pN7s.png
 
If it is a GPU, it needs to be more powerful than a 970/980, cost less and uses even less power, otherwise people simply aren't interested.

Thats not necessarily true, its just got to compete with it, not beat it.

Will be interesting to see what they come up with and if its Tonga based, what a full fat chip can do performance/power wise
 
What i dont get is why nvidia came in with such a low price on the 970, lets face it even the most hardcore nvidia fanboy would have to admit its a bit of a shocker

Well the Gm204 clearly doesn't cost them a fortune to make ( as indicated by the 970's release price). I guess they just thought they can make a massive margin on the 980 as it will have flagship status and then just punish AMD with a a low margin on the 970.
 
It's going to be their new GPU which doubles as a radiator for the whole family in the coming winter months.
 
I am going to go out on a limb and say Radeon, purely because they HAVE to do something to answer the new Geforce cards and a price drop simply isn't a viable fix, I mean they would have to drop the 295X2 to sub £500 and the 290X to sub £250 to make them a viable option again And I can't see them doing that.

Something they could do as a quick stop gap would be a dual 290 (non X) card for sub £400, that may take some wind out of the 980's sails. Or perhaps a dual 285 card to rival the 970 /shrug.
 
Last edited:
I am going to go out on a limb and say Radeon, purely because they HAVE to do something to answer the new Geforce cards and a price drop simply isn't a viable fix, I mean they would have to drop the 295X2 to sub £500 and the 290X to sub £250 to make them a viable option again And I can't see them doing that.

Looking through the 970 owners thread I've not seen a single 970 beat my 290 by a decent amount of FPS and most of them actually lose to my 290 despite them being clocked 1.5Ghz or higher.

From a performance point of view these new Nvidia cards are no threat to AMD, the only thing they do have is low power consumption.
 
Looking through the 970 owners thread I've not seen a single 970 beat my 290 by a decent amount of FPS and most of them actually lose to my 290 despite them being clocked 1.5Ghz or higher.

Correct me if I am wrong here but you have a high clocking 290X right? 1250MHz is way above what mine could manage, so the fact you can beat average clocking 970's that cost £80-£100 less while using half the power and putting out half the heat isn't exactly something to write home about.


From a performance point of view these new Nvidia cards are no threat to AMD, the only thing they do have is low power consumption.

From a purely performance point of view you would be right, if they didn't cost substantially less, use substantially less power and generate substantially less heat.

Look at it this way, the are two cards, card A is slightly faster out of the box, card B is faster on average when both are over clocked, card A also uses twice the power of card B, puts out twice the heat, and costs £80 more. Based on that which would you buy?

One of the best parts of the 290 series was they cost less than the competition and on average performed better when over-clocking was brought into it, two advantages they have now lost.

--------------------

Don't get me wrong, I don't hate AMD at all, I would love to see them answer this threat, because competition is good for everyone, but trying to claim the is no threat is just ridiculous.
 
Well the Gm204 clearly doesn't cost them a fortune to make ( as indicated by the 970's release price). I guess they just thought they can make a massive margin on the 980 as it will have flagship status and then just punish AMD with a a low margin on the 970.

Exactly this, the GTX 980 is just the current premium 9XX , paying a lot more for a lil extra. The 970 is the price VS performance sweet spot for sure.

I hope AMD come out strong, it will push the 980 Ti closer to launch :D
 
NVidia needs amd and vice versa

competition is a good thing,something will come out of the amd stables im sure
 
Look at it this way, the are two cards, card A is slightly faster out of the box, card B is faster on average when both are over clocked, card A also uses twice the power of card B, puts out twice the heat, and costs £80 more. Based on that which would you buy?

The one with the 512bit bus... :D
 
Do they mean the first AMD GPU, the first ATi GPU, or the first AMD GPU post ATi buyout? The image has the FirePro logo in the background but that would be too obvious surely?

With the red and blue imagery I am guessing this may have something to do with 3D? or be a shot at Intel not Nvidia, or the announcement that Intel have adopted Mantle, or something else entirely.
 
Last edited:
Do they mean the first AMD GPU, the first ATi GPU, or the first AMD GPU post ATi buyout? The image has the FirePro logo in the background but that would be too obvious surely?

With the red and blue imagery I am guessing this may have something to do with 3D? or be a shot at Intel not Nvidia, or the announcement that Intel have adopted Mantle, or something else entirely.


The answer to me quoted question is the ATI Mach8 GPU.

No idea how that might relate. Next level APU?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom