-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMd tri core gaming vid
- Thread starter Gerard
- Start date
nVidia are dropping their next IGP to the market soon enough but it is not as good as the 780G offering by AMD.
They say Tri-Core is better than Quad Core because in most circumstances the 4th core is not doing anything or much. So you could have a very quick games machine for very little.
They say Tri-Core is better than Quad Core because in most circumstances the 4th core is not doing anything or much. So you could have a very quick games machine for very little.
Soldato
- Joined
- 15 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 15,678
- Location
- Chengdu
Nail.Head.Win
I don't understand why there is quite a bit of negativity towards this platform, more powerful integrated graphics is a great thing. If it takes off then it'll only result in better IGP competition all round.
Associate
- Joined
- 10 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 1,165
- Location
- in the arse of england.
EXACTLY!
so many daft negative people in here. can you not see further than your own noses ? the implications of this technology for mobile devices and low end desktops is both broad and exciting.
but i guess some of you have never heard of credit where credits due.
p.s. does anyone know when tri core AMD chips are comming ? im getting tired of waiting to shift from 939...
Last edited:
EXACTLY!
so many daft negative people in here. can you not see further than your own noses ? the implications of this technology for mobile devices and low end desktops is both broad and exciting.
but i guess some of you have never heard of credit where credits due.
p.s. does anyone know when tri core AMD chips are comming ? im getting tired of waiting to shift from 939...
Um dont nvidia have a mobile 8800gtx allready?
When i look for a good graphics i want looks and framerate, what fps was that water running @, that bloke might as well had an AMD hat and AMD T-Shirt on as well as an AMD coffee mug and a little AMD flag and an AMD tattoo in the middle of his forehead
Me thinks AMD are gunning for the OEM market, because if nvidia really wanted it they could have probably had it a looong time ago
And btw in no way am i a fanboy, i was running ATi all the way up till my 9700pro, then nvidia picked up the ball and have pretty much being running with it since.
Now the real question is how many AMD references are in this post
Soldato
- Joined
- 15 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 15,678
- Location
- Chengdu
Stop and think about it, do you really think this is competing with the 8800m?
The answer is: no, no it isn't...
The 8800m is not integrated into the motherboard, it eats batteries for breakfast. It's a high end graphics card and it costs a packet. (which you have not taken into consideration at all and which is probably the most important factor)
This product is not aimed at you, it's aimed at entry level systems. You want high end graphics made for pure gaming, entry level PC's are not for that...
And of course AMD are gunning for the OEM market, AMD CPU, AMD chipset with AMD integrated graphics. I don't see what all in one solution Nvidia could come out with.
The answer is: no, no it isn't...
The 8800m is not integrated into the motherboard, it eats batteries for breakfast. It's a high end graphics card and it costs a packet. (which you have not taken into consideration at all and which is probably the most important factor)
This product is not aimed at you, it's aimed at entry level systems. You want high end graphics made for pure gaming, entry level PC's are not for that...
And of course AMD are gunning for the OEM market, AMD CPU, AMD chipset with AMD integrated graphics. I don't see what all in one solution Nvidia could come out with.
I'm pretty sure a mobile 8800GTX is far from cheap.
The point here is that the 'worst' graphics cards should be getting much closer to enthusiast cards, meaning more people can play games with decent visuals (purple shirters/supermarketers etc) because these chipsets should be just as cheap as GMA chips.
Imagine the future- your latest £180 Nvidia/ATI card is only 20% (speculation alert) faster than an integrated grpahics card...... what would they do to get your money?
The point here is that the 'worst' graphics cards should be getting much closer to enthusiast cards, meaning more people can play games with decent visuals (purple shirters/supermarketers etc) because these chipsets should be just as cheap as GMA chips.
Imagine the future- your latest £180 Nvidia/ATI card is only 20% (speculation alert) faster than an integrated grpahics card...... what would they do to get your money?
