• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD VEGA confirmed for 2017 H1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Considering how long it took to move from 28nm is the next move really going to be so quick?

You have to remember that was due to TSMC having some issues on their end. GF on the other hand skipped 10nm and has been working on straight on 7nm. Although this is with DUV, I suspect the 7nm+ will be 7nm made with EUV.
 
The Titans aren't compute cards. They are for gaming. I really don't understand why people are in denial about this.

+1

People have been saying it since the original Titan launched though. NVidia very obviously marketed it as a gaming card, said nothing about compute or HPC.


Nvidia call them GTX cards and they have gaming driver support.

If that wasn't the case why would they remove the first Titans workload capabilities and release the unlocked TxP straight after the 1080ti if not to maintain it's fastest card position?
 
People have been saying it since the original Titan launched though. NVidia very obviously marketed it as a gaming card, said nothing about compute or HPC.

It's NVIDIA themselves saying it's not a gaming card in their reviewer briefs though; then they slap on the GeForce drivers and branding.

No wonder there's confusion.
 
You have to remember that was due to TSMC having some issues on their end. GF on the other hand skipped 10nm and has been working on straight on 7nm. Although this is with DUV, I suspect the 7nm+ will be 7nm made with EUV.

As a great man once said "That was a waste of a perfectly good explanation". :confused:

DUV?
EUV?

You'll have to excuse me while I go and read up on it... ;)

Still flogging that horse ah...

It has compute but CAN NOT do it asynchronously due to lack of hardware which is why it's an issue to use effectively. The driver/software has to do the scheduling.

Oh I forgot.it's D.P (Damage Patrol)

This is what I thought was the case, but again I need to go have a read.
 
You have to remember that was due to TSMC having some issues on their end. GF on the other hand skipped 10nm and has been working on straight on 7nm. Although this is with DUV, I suspect the 7nm+ will be 7nm made with EUV.
Some basic reading suggests that 7nm is nowhere near ready for prime time; ditto EUV. Wiki (I know) suggests 7nm won't be available until 2020 in high volume.
 
so reading through the thread, it doesn't look like i missed much, apart from the HBCC being Dx12 only ?

That's speculation from folks in here, nothing about it being DX12 only has been stated.

Actually there is a feature added in DX12 as MANDATORY but also optionally available in DX11 called Tiled Resources. I quote from Microsoft:

Tiled Resources decouple a D3D Resource object from its backing memory (resources in the past had a 1:1 relationship with their backing memory). This allows for a variety of interesting scenarios such as streaming in texture data and reusing or reducing memory usage.

I have said several times that I would be surprised if HBCC worked without support from software and it seems to me that AMD are probably exploiting somethings like this. If the game supports this feature (whether DX11 or DX12) the AMD driver should be able to exploit the HBCC.

This is a hardware feature, it doesn't matter what API the app/game is using.

Not true. If the HBCC was unaware of VRAM access patterns it would need to start transferring data after a 'cache miss' meaning it is too late already: there will be latency and min FPS drop.
 
Last edited:
As a great man once said "That was a waste of a perfectly good explanation". :confused:

DUV?
EUV?

You'll have to excuse me while I go and read up on it... ;)

It is to do with the way a integrated circuit design is transferred to the silicon - dies are made using a process not a million miles removed from old film photography - grossly simplified DUV and EUV refer to the light used to expose the design involved in this.
 
Just saw http://pro.radeon.com/en-us/vega-frontier-edition/

Can you game on a Radeon Vega Frontier Edition? The answer is yes, absolutely. But because this graphics card is optimized for professional use cases (and priced accordingly), if gaming is your primary reason for buying a GPU, I’d suggest waiting just a little while longer for the lower-priced, gaming-optimized Radeon RX Vega graphics card. You’ll be glad you did.

I couldn't help thinking "yes, because by then Voltas will be available..."
 
It's NVIDIA themselves saying it's not a gaming card in their reviewer briefs though; then they slap on the GeForce drivers and branding.

No wonder there's confusion.
That might be the case for the Titan Xp, but as I've said people have been saying this since the very first Titan came out about 4 years ago.

Obviously nVidia are talking ***** now though, given the fact that it's a GTX and runs GeForce drivers as you said.
 
As a great man once said "That was a waste of a perfectly good explanation". :confused:

DUV?
EUV?

You'll have to excuse me while I go and read up on it... ;)



This is what I thought was the case, but again I need to go have a read.

It's basically how they etch the designs into the silicon using lasers, DUV is deep ultraviolet and has been used for a good while so is more mature, while EUV is extreme ultraviolet which should allow less complexity for smaller nodes but development on this has been pretty hard and slow.

Some basic reading suggests that 7nm is nowhere near ready for prime time; ditto EUV. Wiki (I know) suggests 7nm won't be available until 2020 in high volume.

GF estimates 7nm with DUV by H2 2018, which does kind of match with Navi's release, which I suspect would be delayed anyway: http://www.anandtech.com/show/10704/globalfoundries-updates-roadmap-7-nm-in-2h-2018
 
Still flogging that horse ah...

It has compute but CAN NOT do it asynchronously due to lack of hardware which is why it's an issue to use effectively. The driver/software has to do the scheduling.

Oh I forgot.it's D.P (Damage Patrol)

There is a lot of confusion on this subject - it is worth reading up on Kepler's 2nd DMA engine (disabled on GeForce) as that kind of leads into a better understanding of the issue and why what you are saying is both right and wrong.

There is a subtle difference a lot trip over between the two aspects of you can process both graphic and compute tasks but you can't mix graphic and compute tasks.
 
Last edited:
It is in same niche as Titan Xp.
raja_koduri_-_radeon_rising_-_amd_2017_financial_analyst_day-09_575px.png


I'm guessing Frontier belongs to >$500 spot on this picture.
Note no mention of gaming in that slide. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom