Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
personly true quad core seems to talk to each core better than 2x dual cores. also with true quad core u can clock each core to different speeds, so if theres a weak core u can clock that core lower than the other 3..
but as i said before i am right in thinking that the phenom is the only true quad core chip? (not that it makes a difference but im curious if this is true)
yep...I didn't know that. That's pretty amazing to be honest.
So you could run 3dmark06 with core 1, 2 and 3 to lets say 2.9Ghz but the poorer core 4 you could run at 2.75ghz and it runs fine?.
u mean B2... B3 is the phenoms without the bugthat's what someone i read over on another forum did to his B3 Phenom to try and avoid the TLB bug
Socket 754 - 478/LGA775.2. They don't keep changing socket types as often as Intel so upgrading an older rig is easier/cheaper
What you or me buys makes no difference to AMD or Intel and by supporting those who are not competitively at the top you are not necessarily supporting the market. Being infront makes the money men think "hmm, invest in new technology, now why would we want to do that?".3. If no-one buys AMD then Intel will have a monopoly and every thread will be about the increasing costs of new systems.
that's what someone i read over on another forum did to his B3 Phenom to try and avoid the TLB bug
to the OP, you've got a AMD motherboard so i would say check to see if it supports phenoems with a update bios, if it does then go for it.
An X2 6400+ is enough for every game out there already, unless you regularly use software that makes use of quad (and makes use of it well) you are wasting your time (and money) and may even see a performance drop.but is there really that much of an advantage if i personally already have a amd 6400+ ?
the new 9x50 phenoms haven't got the bug. only the 9x00 phenoms . the bug is with the l3 cach, the system sometimes crashs. personly i've never seen it since i bought my phenom..what is this bug?
i went from a 6000+ to a phenom and it does bottleneck in games at stock because most games only use 1 or 2 cores so e.g the 6000+ runs at 3ghz x2 and my phenom runs at 2.2ghz x4 but only using 1 or 2 core in games the 6000+ runs much better.... but if u have a game/app that uses 4 cores then the phenom would be much better...yes my board does support phenom
but is there really that much of an advantage if i personally already have a amd 6400+ ?
I know originally was thinking of building a new system but now im actually also interested ina quick upgrade to my current platform if it is in fact worth it?
depends on what happens with the new phenom chips i may in fact build my next system around intel
There isn't a why cos they aren't. If you are comparing 770 to P35 you can find P35 boards in the same price range. Same with the 790s and X38.AM2 mobos are much cheaper than Intel P35s, why is that?
yep...
![]()
u mean B2... B3 is the phenoms without the bug