• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD's market share among Steam players dropped after Sep 2017

hmm, guess we wont know unless someone finds out, cant imagine it counting your cpus gpu as well as your discrete one though. would be pointless.

and i guess it really isnt a foregone conclusion that ryzen is selling like anything. especially if you look at this forum, you would think everyone has a 1080ti. but on the survey, its hardly anyone.

It only counts the primary rendering device - also in some cases the integrated GPU becomes disabled when a dGPU is detected and/or unless you plug a monitor into it anyhow.
 
The graphs make no sense at all. All four core Intel CPU's ship with a GPU apart from a few of the specialised E3 Xeons that are EOL.

Steam users must love E3 Xeons GTX750's Win7. China number one stupid master?

Anyone ever done a steam survey? I've never done one in my life.
I get them quite often, done maybe 20 of them on my home machine. Never done one on my work machine even though I game on it more though!
 
Looking at the stats for March 2018, AMD has actually increased its share for people using CPUs on the Windows OS >> http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/?platform=pc

22LIHI9.png
 
It being optional doesn't make it invalid, it's random.
I don't really know what to say for the other.
The fact that it is optional means it is biased and non-random. Its called selection bias and is a well-known source of bias in surveys https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_bias. Also, any conclusions or generalities apply only to the proportion of steam users that opted-in, it is entirely possible that there are correlations between the hardware and the likelihood that someone will submit data to the survey.
 
PUBG.

You'll notice as people (mainly chinese gamers) stop playing the game it will return back to normal.

How does that translate? Most cheaters who keep getting their accounts banned by running aiming-bots (hence submitting duplicated hardware survey records with new accounts) are running Intel quad core CPUs?
 
The fact that it is optional means it is biased and non-random. Its called selection bias and is a well-known source of bias in surveys https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_bias. Also, any conclusions or generalities apply only to the proportion of steam users that opted-in, it is entirely possible that there are correlations between the hardware and the likelihood that someone will submit data to the survey.

It is possible but usually a large enough random sampling, even optional, will be generally indicative in a case like this. If anything people with higher end and under-dog hardware would be more likely to submit results and people with lower end less likely which the stats don't appear to be significant skewed by.
 
It is possible but usually a large enough random sampling, even optional, will be generally indicative in a case like this. If anything people with higher end and under-dog hardware would be more likely to submit results and people with lower end less likely which the stats don't appear to be significant skewed by.

Total balls.
 
How does that translate? Most cheaters who keep getting their accounts banned by running aiming-bots (hence submitting duplicated hardware survey records with new accounts) are running Intel quad core CPUs?

Who said they are cheaters just because they are Chinese?
 
Who said they are cheaters just because they are Chinese?

I'm not sure about here, but I've watched many Chinese streamers playing PUBG. That ecosystem is in constant ban - new account - ban - new account cycles, because the game is simply unplayable without aiming-bot. Even the top streamer had to cheat, which ultimately resulted him being banned from all Chinese streaming platforms by the government.

When you talk about skewed statistics, the first thing that comes up in my mind would be the massive number of new accounts.
 
I'm not sure about here, but I've watched many Chinese streamers playing PUBG. That ecosystem is in constant ban - new account - ban - new account cycles, because the game is simply unplayable without aiming-bot. Even the top streamer had to cheat, which ultimately resulted him being banned from all Chinese streaming platforms by the government.

When you talk about skewed statistics, the first thing that comes up in my mind would be the massive number of new accounts.

The cheating on PUBG is rife and most of the dodgy players I come across have suspiciously Chinese sounding names.
 
Back
Top Bottom