daz said:Dean Ashton was almost certainly a better deal. Darren Bent was an unquestionably better deal, but was arguably undervalued due to only having 12 months left on his contract.
NokkonWud said:I wouldn't say the price tag was stupid, he does have a lot of abilty when it comes to dribbling with the ball etc.. He is far better than, lets say, Heskey who was also a similar price tag.
ballistic said:that's because Bruce is an absolute moron to pay a ridiculous price for Emile William Ivanhoe Heskey, who by the way cost £6.25 Million, that's £2.25Million less AND has 45 England caps AND was signed from Liverpool not a championship team.
memphisto said:er yeah but whats yer point Im pretty sure heskey cost liverpool £11 million which is £2.5million mor ethan what johnsen is costing !
ballistic said:yes when he was 20, and the market was inflated and from a premiership side then and he didn't score 60% of his goals from penalties and houllier was an idiot who later got sacked, what's your point?
daz said:Dean Ashton was almost certainly a better deal. Darren Bent was an unquestionably better deal, but was arguably undervalued due to only having 12 months left on his contract.
Nedved11 said:
Loki said:Thats a really good point. Dean Ashton is a vastly underated player. Personally I would have took him to the world cup over Peter Crouch and Theo Walcott. Plays a number of positions up front and technically a very good player.
freshy said:for a team like bolton would offer a lot.
axe said:couldnt you just get RvN for that amount and im sure he will score more goals as well