There seem to be a few of these around at the moment, thought I'd join the trend.
The current task is refurbishing a shower cubicle which has damp as deep as the stud wall, no further. Two walls are brick, and two are stud walls, the floor is concrete. Shower tray is raised.
The diameter of the cubicle is 1200 x 770, which happens to be the exact size of the old shower tray, meaning that it was previously boarded to the tray lip and then tiled over it. Ideally this would not be repeated and therefore the current thought is to go for a smaller tray measuring 1100 x 700. This means that the walls will need to be battened out a fair bit, calculations as follows:
Cubicle size 1200 x 770
New tray size 1100 x 700
770 - 700 - 25 (12.5 x 2 plaster boards) - 38 (batten) = 7 = 3.5mm gap each side
1200 - 1100 - 25 - 63 (batten) = 12 = 6mm gap each side
Does that stack up? If so, it raises some questions:
1. Should the 63mm batten be fitted as an entire new stud wall against/onto the brick, or would single battens suffice?
2. If using single battens - 63mm is a big ol' size to fix to brick, is it better to use brackets to attach the wood to the wall as opposed to really long screws through the wood?
3. Are those gaps left each side OK in terms of being optimal for sealing and tiling?
4. Is this even the best course of action? Should we revert back to the existing 1200 x 770? Would rather not.
Other questions:
5. Replacing stud wall sections due to mould/damp - easy enough - but should there be some protection between them and the concrete floor? Currently only one side appears to have some sort of mat/vinyl type covering between the wood and the floor.
6. As mentioned previously, the shower tray has been raised and has been raised on a wooden frame, with what looks like chipboard supporting the tray and metal threaded legs to hold it all up. This has given the tray quite a lot of height, more than the 100mm legs that seem to be common. Currently plan to replicate this lifting method on the new tray, would appreciate any thoughts.
Thanks - I'm guessing @200sols and @Buffman in particular may be able to offer help
The current task is refurbishing a shower cubicle which has damp as deep as the stud wall, no further. Two walls are brick, and two are stud walls, the floor is concrete. Shower tray is raised.
The diameter of the cubicle is 1200 x 770, which happens to be the exact size of the old shower tray, meaning that it was previously boarded to the tray lip and then tiled over it. Ideally this would not be repeated and therefore the current thought is to go for a smaller tray measuring 1100 x 700. This means that the walls will need to be battened out a fair bit, calculations as follows:
Cubicle size 1200 x 770
New tray size 1100 x 700
770 - 700 - 25 (12.5 x 2 plaster boards) - 38 (batten) = 7 = 3.5mm gap each side
1200 - 1100 - 25 - 63 (batten) = 12 = 6mm gap each side
Does that stack up? If so, it raises some questions:
1. Should the 63mm batten be fitted as an entire new stud wall against/onto the brick, or would single battens suffice?
2. If using single battens - 63mm is a big ol' size to fix to brick, is it better to use brackets to attach the wood to the wall as opposed to really long screws through the wood?
3. Are those gaps left each side OK in terms of being optimal for sealing and tiling?
4. Is this even the best course of action? Should we revert back to the existing 1200 x 770? Would rather not.
Other questions:
5. Replacing stud wall sections due to mould/damp - easy enough - but should there be some protection between them and the concrete floor? Currently only one side appears to have some sort of mat/vinyl type covering between the wood and the floor.
6. As mentioned previously, the shower tray has been raised and has been raised on a wooden frame, with what looks like chipboard supporting the tray and metal threaded legs to hold it all up. This has given the tray quite a lot of height, more than the 100mm legs that seem to be common. Currently plan to replicate this lifting method on the new tray, would appreciate any thoughts.
Thanks - I'm guessing @200sols and @Buffman in particular may be able to offer help
Last edited: