Another Video editing build, but which CPU and Mobo (mATX)

Associate
Joined
7 Jul 2008
Posts
1,285
Location
Newcastle upon Tyne
I have been asked to build a good spec PC for a friend of mine who is a photographer and videographer.

He used Premier Pro CC, After Effects and Photoshop

Spec so far:

My basket at Overclockers UK:
Total: £1,798.13 (includes shipping: £13.20)

The two m.2 drives are for OS and scratch/Media disks and the SSD for the work

The budget is about £2.5K however just cant decide to go AMD or Intel.

Threadripper 1950x and mobo (God they are expensive) or Intel i9-9900k and mobo

Any suggestions re processor, mobo and cooling (I know someone here will say air cooling :) )
 
Associate
Joined
6 Nov 2005
Posts
2,417
Adobe loves Intel, or at least it loves high clocks and IPC more than it likes cores and threads. You can also offload some of the work onto intel IGPU. So while most of the time I would say AMD offers more for your money, in this case I would go with an Intel system. Though I'd be very tempted to look at either the i7 9700K or the i7 8700K over the i7 9900K as you'd get the same clocks and IPC for a bunch less money.
 
Associate
Joined
6 Nov 2005
Posts
2,417
ah yeah, sorry for not being clear, the 9900k is better than the others, but not a whole lot better for the extra £120 odd quid it costs :) so like 10% more performance for 35% more cost
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Dec 2015
Posts
18,514
There's a good difference with 8700k Vs 9900k in Prem and lightroom, after effects and Photoshop, it's come out on top only because of clock speed rather then core count

Davinci will make better use for gtx 1080ti for video editing . Worth him giving that a try and seeing

With Adobe products, 1080ti only fairs a little better then gtx 1070ti , Resolve would use the GPU power more then Adobe .
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Dec 2015
Posts
18,514
So are you saying the 9900 is the preferred choice or the 8700

What about Threadripper
16 core TR is technically the best you should get as 24+ have memory channel design issues .
But with Adobe , apart from exporting of batch exporting they are often worse due to slower clock speed and IPC

And apologies, typo my end, meant to say 8700 Vs 9700.
9900 will lead as has 5-10% edge over 9700 due to HT , 9700k has edge over 8700k.
Bit like running i7 4c/8t against i5 6c/6t at same speed , Six core would come equal or on top
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Dec 2015
Posts
18,514
The one thing that concerns me is a lot of reports about high heat when overclocked, however I think this is when trying to get it to 5ghz

Good 360 AIO/CLC cooler like Silent Loop, Eisbear or NZXT 360 and should be good or flagship Air cooler.

8700k run hotter. The thing that hits hardest the most is VRMs, hence listing Gigabyte /Aorus for differing price points. Z390 almost been designed if they already knew 10 core might of been in the table ...
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Jan 2016
Posts
3,727
Location
Derbyshire
my sister in law does photography and editing, she uses some adobe software, but it requires only intel and she recently got an Acer S24-880 which is an AIO, thats no important, but this has a coffee lake i7+ 8550U which is perfect for what she does, so in your case, find out if the software uses only one brand of chip otherwise its an i7 vs a 2700/TR.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
7 Jul 2008
Posts
1,285
Location
Newcastle upon Tyne
Cinebench R15 Single Threaded
Score (Higher is Better)
amd 164
intel 216
Cinebench R15 Multi-Threaded
Score (Higher is Better)
amd 3017
intel 2032

Handbrake 1.1.0 - 1080p60 x264 3500 kbps Faster
Frames Per Second
(Higher is Better)
amd 259
intel 229
Handbrake 1.1.0 - 1080p60 HEVC 3500 kbps Fast

Frames Per Second
(Higher is Better)
amd 215
intel 226

This is interesting - Adobe Premiere Pro CC Multi Core Performance

Suggesting that once you get to 8 core its dimminishing returns.

Then there is cost, based on todays prices from Overclockers:

Intel: i9-9900k = £500, motherboard £160. Total=£660
AMD: TR 1950x = £560, motherboard £300. Total=£860 and from what I can see no mATX boards
 
Back
Top Bottom