Fake ones off ebay?![]()
If they are fakes, then they are bloody good ones. The packaging is 100% legit, and they clean just as well as ones from a shop, so I'm not complaining.
£4-£6 for a 4-pack, £12 for a 16-pack.
Fake ones off ebay?![]()
On a serious note. I find my electric toothbrush very good for cleaning my back (and wisdom) teeth, whereas my manual toothbrush is best for my front teeth.
I tend to alternate which brush I use throughout the week.
It's funny, I'm just about to go to my place of work (that big dirty indian named shop) to get me one of these Philips Sonicare Toothbrush for 90 notes.
Anybody have an opinion on this?
Posted just as you wrote this. Yes, she recommends it.
The results indicate that brushing treatment with power or sonic toothbrushes may lead to significantly higher loss of demineralised enamel compared to toothbrushing without power or sonic support.
It also results in cleaner teeth.
Im sure the proper 3 minutes with any brush would give results though.
It 'may' lead to higher loss of enamel. I'll ask my wife later about it when she is out of surgery. Doesn't seem very scientific to me, anybody can say something ike that. Just like scrubbing anything hard for too long will wear something down.
Can always get some dentures when you are older anyway - who cares!
Not exactly cheap though![]()
A. Wiegand, M. Begic, T. Attin (2006) In vitro Evaluation of Abrasion of Eroded Enamel by Different Manual, Power and Sonic Toothbrushes Caries Research Vol 40 No 1 2006
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the susceptibility of eroded enamel to brushing abrasion performed by manual, power or sonic toothbrushes. Bovine enamel samples were subjected to 5 cycles, each consisting of 5 min demineralisation, 15 min remineralisation and 10 min brushing in a machine. Toothbrushing with the activated electric devices was supplemented with 20 linear strokes/min. Furthermore, enamel specimens were brushed with 20 linear strokes/min or 80 linear strokes/min with the electric toothbrushes without their individual operating action. A manual brush was applied at 100, 20 or 80 linear strokes/min. Specimens of the control group were not brushed after demineralisation. Loss of enamel was determined by profilometry. For all groups, substrate loss for linear brushing treatment applying 20 or 80 strokes/min did not differ significantly from the control (4.97 ± 1.49 µm). Three power toothbrushing treatments significantly increased abrasion compared to linear brushing treatment with 20 or 80 strokes/min in their inactivated condition. The results indicate that brushing treatment with power or sonic toothbrushes may lead to significantly higher loss of demineralised enamel compared to toothbrushing without power or sonic support.