Anyone Disappointed With X1900 Performance

[dreigns]

After much reading I found my self disappointed with the X1900xt scores in games and 3dmark most sites only use the Gforce 7800 GTX 256 which is a slow card

I know ATI are best for image Quality

3DMark 05 1024x764
X1900 XT = 10958
My Geforce 7800 GTX 512 = 10008

Now my system isn't as good as the system they used for the 1900's so I would get higher if the systems were the same Here's some other stats

3DMark 06 1240X1024
X1900 XT = 5579
GF 7800 GTX 512 = 5419

Half Life 2 -
Not my Card now as I don't know what test they use

HL2 Lost Coast Max Settings, 1280x1024 4xAA/8xAF
X1900 XT = 97
GF 7800 GTX 256 = 95

HL2 Lost Coast Max Settings, 1600x1280 4xAA/8xAF
X1900 XT = 78
GF 7800 GTX 256 = 74

Now I expected A little more power from this card I know there's a XTX version but really it isn't a great deal more powerful does anyone else feel Disappointed with the speed of this card.

 

[dreigns]

Your missing the point the x1900 isn't realy a Next Gen card it hardly a speed beast yes it might be fastest by a hole 5 - 20 fps in a lot a lot of games but realy this is tiny and my settings are not overcloked there default and the system of the x1900 was a top of the range pc far above my system so if theres only 100 - 1000 point in it and my system is the lower end the x1900 isn't realy a big step up from other cards.

Yes I know it's cheaper and i'm not realy to make all you people have just got one feel bad I am just saying that realy this card isn't a NVidia buster and with the G71 only 2 - 3 months away is it realy worth the effort.

Apart from that speed the Image's quality is great very crisp.