Anyone else with 1 eye only? (3D related)

Randomface74 · 23 Jul 2011 at 20:02

I'll buy it when it can give me a blowjob. Until then - what's in it for me?

DJ_Martin · 23 Jul 2011 at 20:11

And before someone says that it is not a reliable source, I realise that, someone sent it to me on facebook but it is still funny.

Energize · 23 Jul 2011 at 20:59

AcidHell2 said:
It's hard not to at the top range.
Even though I'm not impressed although films filmed in 3d do look good, it's still dark and makes my eyes feel odd(I think it's because the film chooses the focus point, rather than my head) but it's here to stay and will come standard. Over the next few years it'll work it's way down to the cheap models. Films are 3d, sky has a 3d service. So people who say it's a dead gimmick, IMO are very wrong indeed.

It is a gimmick, no one cares for it or uses it. Same with 3g video chat and all those other technologies that were heavily marketed and never took off. Ever present but unused and unloved, a gimmick.

Rack · 24 Jul 2011 at 19:18

Phenomenologica said:
http://www.2d-glasses.com/

Solved.

Are you being serious there? Surely for someone with only one working eye 2D and 3D glasses would be identical?

DJ_Martin · 24 Jul 2011 at 19:58

Energize said:
It is a gimmick, no one cares for it or uses it. Same with 3g video chat and all those other technologies that were heavily marketed and never took off. Ever present but unused and unloved, a gimmick.

Just to pick up on one of your points, I use facetime all the time with a couple of mates, it's also free if I am connected to wifi.

Rack said:
Are you being serious there? Surely for someone with only one working eye 2D and 3D glasses would be identical?

This is for those anti-3D people who say it makes them feel sick but can see the 3D fine.

mame · 24 Jul 2011 at 23:05

3D probably won't get that big untill there are 3D TVs that don't need glasses. This could be years and years away. With that in mind, out of interest, how do those 3D holograms look to you?