haha i fail to see how a 20k bmw is chavtastic
i quite like it
Dressing a standard road car up as a racing car = chav to me I'm afraid.

haha i fail to see how a 20k bmw is chavtastic
i quite like it
Dressing a standard road car up as a racing car = chav to me I'm afraid.![]()
Dressing a standard road car up as a racing car = chav to me I'm afraid.![]()
Its a 320si... thats makes quite abit of a difference to what you are trying to imply me thinks. Its not your run of the mill 320.
Id have it without the colours.
It's not a normal homologation car though, it has 100bhp less than the WTCC car, has a full interior, road suspension, brakes, wheels, no rollcage etc. It's a standard road car. I'm not even sure why they had to produce it really as it's basically a 320i with 20 more bhp.Are these not homologation specials. I read BMW had to produce so many to allow entry into WTCC.
S'ok, but for 18K theres a lot more out there with more fun/appeal.
[TW]Fox;10672727 said:but apparently its high revving nature means its quite a laugh to drive.
It's not a normal homologation car though, it has 100bhp less than the WTCC car, has a full interior, road suspension, brakes, wheels, no rollcage etc. It's a standard road car. I'm not even sure why they had to produce it really as it's basically a 320i with 20 more bhp.
Ahhh makes sense, thanks for the info. So rather than being a homologation car, its a road car with some homologation parts on it.I seem to recall (from an old Evo test) that it was produced for specific parts homologation...e.g. engine internals et cetera which on the road car are not used to the best of their abilities but on the WTCC cars allow them to crank it right up...
*n
Nice looking, but really... I wouldn't pay £18k for a car looking like that but could be annihilated by pretty much any chav.