Anyone got a list of what chips give what output..

2bullish · 17 Jul 2007 at 22:22

...with winsmp for f@h. I only ask because im just about to bring 2 q6600's online with 4gb of ram and want to know what ppd they will produce 24/7?

shadowscotland · 17 Jul 2007 at 22:29

fahinfo - remember it data is by Ghz per core (so times result by 12 if @3.0)

booyaka · 17 Jul 2007 at 22:32

can give you a couple of instances.

E6600 @ 3.15ghz does

Project : 2608
Core : SMP Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 1385

-- E6600 @ 3.15ghz --

Min. Time / Frame : 13mn 27s - 1482.83 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 13mn 27s - 1482.83 ppd
Cur. Time / Frame : 13mn 27s - 1482.83 ppd
R3F. Time / Frame : 13mn 27s - 1482.83 ppd

Project : 2609
Core : SMP Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 1523

-- E6600 @ 3.15ghz --

Min. Time / Frame : 12mn 58s - 1691.35 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 13mn 39s - 1606.68 ppd
No Cur. Time / Frame
No R3F. Time / Frame

Project : 2610
Core : SMP Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 1523

-- E6600 @ 3.15ghz --

Min. Time / Frame : 12mn 42s - 1726.87 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 20mn 56s - 1047.67 ppd
No Cur. Time / Frame
No R3F. Time / Frame

(the average is dragged down due to recent change from E4300 @3ghz to E6600 @ 3.15ghz)

roject : 2651
Core : SMP Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 1760

-- E6600 @ 3.15ghz --

Min. Time / Frame : 13mn 43s - 1847.68 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 14mn 02s - 1805.99 ppd
No Cur. Time / Frame
No R3F. Time / Frame

Would suggest that 3k per day is easily in reach with the Q6600!

2bullish · 17 Jul 2007 at 22:34

shadowscotland said:
fahinfo - remember it data is by Ghz per core (so times result by 12 if @3.0)

with respect thats to complicated for this time of night. How about a q6600 running at 3.0 ghz with 4 gb of ram 24/7 ballpark ppd?

EDIT Booyaka whats up with your output, I get more running smp from my xps m1710 laptop at stock, currently at 1400 ppd?

ITR · 17 Jul 2007 at 22:39

Q6600 @ 3.3 will do 3800ppd native linux smp on wu 3043,3052 (1440 pointers) and approx 4000-4200 if your lucky enough to pick up some 1760 pointers.

SiriusB · 17 Jul 2007 at 22:51

Check out Cob's output - that's a quaddie running 4 clients in native Linux.

I'd knock a couple hundred PPD off for winSMP as it isn't as productive as LinuxSMP

2bullish · 17 Jul 2007 at 23:39

In that case you're all in trouble ladies. :cool:

As that should take my farm to a conservative 300,000 + per month

ouchy

MGP · 18 Jul 2007 at 00:50

2bullish said:
In that case you're all in trouble ladies. As that should take my farm to a conservative 300,000 + per month

ouchy

time to throw in the towel then. You might as well start your own team and seek world domination

booyaka · 18 Jul 2007 at 10:29

2bullish said:
EDIT Booyaka whats up with your output, I get more running smp from my xps m1710 laptop at stock, currently at 1400 ppd?

no idea - that's winsmp if it makes a difference.

Seems to be ok for me. Defo quicker than my previous E4300

PhillyDee · 18 Jul 2007 at 10:37

My O/C E6600 @ 3.15 is only getting 400 PPD at the moment. Standard windows client, as its not on all the time. Really crappy WU's.

Stelly · 18 Jul 2007 at 10:45

PhillyDee said:
My O/C E6600 @ 3.15 is only getting 400 PPD at the moment. Standard windows client, as its not on all the time. Really crappy WU's.

Know that feeling, I cant install SMP because NOD32 doesn't play nice with it...

Stelly

2bullish · 18 Jul 2007 at 11:06

Didnt know that the new client now likes the use windows explorer settings, unlike its predecessor, so all my winsmp clients have been stuck on "Will end mpi now" all night.

Cob · 18 Jul 2007 at 16:23

ITR said:
Q6600 @ 3.3 will do 3800ppd native linux smp on wu 3043,3052 (1440 pointers) and approx 4000-4200 if your lucky enough to pick up some 1760 pointers.

You're not far off. With a steady stream of 1440'ers I can average 4200-4300ppd, more with the odd 1760'er thrown in.

I'm at ~4000ppd despite averaging an EUE every second day or so.

Speaking of which, has anyone ever had EUE's occurring at the exact same point every time? Mine keep crapping out at 32% for some reason.

cokecan · 18 Jul 2007 at 16:37

stock q here with the winSMP and im still getting over 2000ppd, so at 3.3ghz its gonna pwn tbh

Project : 2605
Core : SMP Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 1760

-- Kentsfield --

Min. Time / Frame : 12mn 04s - 2100.33 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 12mn 06s - 2094.55 ppd
No Cur. Time / Frame
No R3F. Time / Frame

shadowscotland · 18 Jul 2007 at 16:40

check the Run x, Clone x, Gen x numbers - and use the -delete xx flag if they are the same (snapshot had this issue see other thread) server will keep giving you the bad WU unless it 'knows' its finish or bad.

Cob · 18 Jul 2007 at 16:52

'Project: 3043 (Run 6, Clone 6, Gen 84)' every single time.

What's the 'xx' in '-delete xx'?

shadowscotland · 18 Jul 2007 at 16:53

Cob said:
What's the 'xx' in '-delete xx'?

[07:27:44] + Processing work unit
[07:27:44] Core required: FahCore_78.exe
[07:27:44] Core found.
[07:27:44] Working on Unit 05 [June 15 07:27:44]
[07:27:44] + Working ...

the first zero is important as must be two digits (if over 10 irrelivant)
Also tell the folks on the offical forum.

Cob · 18 Jul 2007 at 17:04

Ta.

Tho I can't get it to obey the flag. fah_config is in the CPU4 folder, but the client continues to crunch the WU.

shadowscotland · 18 Jul 2007 at 17:13

You need to stop the client first.. then run with the flag

alturnatively:
might need to stop all your smp threads first

- then run the -delete xx flag (via a shortcut)
then restart all four again minus any more eue's. :cool: