This is the primary reason why virtually every IT project that Accenture is involved with goes horribly wrong.
Could you cite a reference for that 'fact'?
Sure, there are a couple of high profile examples of projects which for one reason or another have gone wrong, run over time, over budget - but that will be the same for any similar company.
There are also an awful lot of very successful projects... although they're the ones you're much less likely to hear much about.
It's true to say that for the most part one of the reasons the pay is good is that you're expected to work hard and at times take on a lot of responsibility relative to your experience. The 'up or out' mentality and the forced distribution of performance ratings is certainly not perfect; but it does keep people on their toes and stops people stagnating. It's not for everyone and an awful lot of people join as graduates and leave after 3 or 4 years. Part of the reason for that is that generally the calibre of recruits is pretty high and there are always clients or competitors on the prowl to recruit them!
I have an interest to declare in that I've worked for Accenture for 7 years since graduating in 2006; plus as an intern for a year between my second and third year at Uni.
Happy to discuss any specific questions by email (trust message for details).
Last edited: