I here you and of course these filth are entiltled to their opinion, however what there saying about creating a 'master race' really gets me, there is no diffrence whatsoever between whites, blacks, asians etc however they seem to belive that white people are better and they should rule the world this is simply not true and very very ignorantFreak_boy said:freedom of speech, what are you all complaining about? they have a right to do whatever they want!
They have as little right to do what they're doing as the muslims who were protesting about a couple of cartoons.Freak_boy said:freedom of speech, what are you all complaining about? they have a right to do whatever they want!
1. What does that have to do with anything?AJUK said:As for the music, even if it is crap (which it is), if it is used to raise money for the BNP, so what, Blair and his bunch accept money from pornographers.
The documentary was about music and the proceeds from sales and gigs being used to fund the BNP. That seems highly relevant to me.Gilly said:1. What does that have to do with anything?
2. I seriously hope you're not comparing 'pornographers' with nazis and fascist extremists.
I was talking about your point about the pornography, not your point about the music.AJUK said:The documentary was about music and the proceeds from sales and gigs being used to fund the BNP. That seems highly relevant to me.
So you are comparing the nazis and the pornographers.AJUK said:As long as the funding bodies stay within the law it is up to them if they wish to use the money to fund a political party. Labour accepted money from dubious sources that are morally unacceptable to many people, as do all political parties, I didn't make any other comparison than that.
Don't put words in my mouth, you know exactly what I mean and it is clear from my post. Political parties receive funding from many different sources, some whiter than white (pardon the pun ), others not so. As I have stated twice, as long as the musicians stay within the law, where the proceeds go is nobody's business but theirs. Move outside the law, a decision we are not really qualified to make, then the funding becomes a problem.Gilly said:I was talking about your point about the pornography, not your point about the music.
So you are comparing the nazis and the pornographers.
Wow.
No child can have a fully rounded opinion in such things. Its why religious schools and children that are religious are such bad things to see.Wryel said:Worst part was the 13 year old girls, now that was just wrong! Are they really old enough to hold such strong views? Or have they been brainwashed like the rest...
I'm not putting words into your mouth. I asked you a question on a statement you had made and you quantified it by saying something that wasn't contrary to the accusation levelled at you. Thats normally an acceptance of the original accusation.AJUK said:Don't put words in my mouth, you know exactly what I mean and it is clear from my post. Political parties receive funding from many different sources, some whiter than white (pardon the pun ), others not so. As I have stated twice, as long as the musicians stay within the law, where the proceeds go is nobody's business but theirs. Move outside the law, a decision we are not really qualified to make, then the funding becomes a problem.