Archbishop refuses to resign

Actually that is a good idea, I think over the weekend I will draft a letter to him also, it will be interesting to see if I get a reply and what he says if he does.

Hmm, can't hurt. The Church is the people, not the man.
I happen to be a member of his local congregation, not at a parish level, but at a diocese level.
I personally feel the replacement of all the 'top men' would be a way to restart the church, as someone once again by the people for the people.
 
They do not believe that at all, Papal infallibility is a very limited thing, it doesn't apply to everything the Papal Office does, neither does it apply to the Pope himself except under very specific conditions.

I think I could perhaps have worded things better. I don't mean papal infallibility extends down the clergy, of course it doesn't. What I mean is that they believe they are part of an organisation which is more correct and right than any other, and that the law of the land come second to the law of the church.

That is not to say that Brady is blameless, the whole affair was poorly dealt with, although there was no Church or State guidelines about what to do in this situation in 1975, it is pretty obvious to anyone that the needs of the Church, specifically the Nobertine Order and the Monastery, were put ahead of the needs of those children and that even if Brady had no authority to deal with Smyth himself, he certainly had the opportunity to make sure someone who would deal with it properly was informed when it became patently obvious that Smyth was effectively being protected, he may have trusted that those with the authority to act in relation to Smyth would treat the evidence seriously and respond appropriately, but when he realised that was not happening then he could have taken it further. ......the fact is that the then Fr Brady went along with the party line and the secrecy of the investigation because he wanted to progress within the hierarchy of the Church, when in fact his first responsibility and the first responsibility of all priests is to their congregation, in particular those who cannot protect themselves such as those children, in this he failed and for that he should resign.

I agree with you entirely there. I'd put it more concisely as he was a participant in a cover up of the most heinous crimes imaginable, and while it was not in his remit to rule on what was right and wrong, it cannot have been anything other than crystal clear that his silence prevented justice being done.
 
Off-topic, but I hate it when people immediately resign due to pressure when someone in their organisation does something wrong.

Why'd you bother getting to that position if you're gonna quit as soon as something happens? Why don't you do something about it instead?

/rant :P
 
Off-topic, but I hate it when people immediately resign due to pressure when someone in their organisation does something wrong.

Why'd you bother getting to that position if you're gonna quit as soon as something happens? Why don't you do something about it instead?

/rant :P

In his case he has now done the things he needs to do. The protocols for safeguarding children are now in place, there is in theory proper protections, proper reporting, and the various investigations and reports at a church and govt level have made their reports.

This ismwhy I feel it is time he goes, to consign the past to history, not to forget it, but to draw a line, and to give people some sence of renewal, rather than a Church that keeps telling us they did nothing wrong individually.
 
Off-topic, but I hate it when people immediately resign due to pressure when someone in their organisation does something wrong.

Why'd you bother getting to that position if you're gonna quit as soon as something happens? Why don't you do something about it instead?

/rant :P

Sometimes I feel people in the public scrutiny are asked to not resign for a few weeks, so that public anger is focused on them, and when they finally do resign there is closure and things can move on.

I think Rebekah Brooks for example was likely told to hold on and we'll make it worth your while rather than resign right away. That way public anger was directed at her because she wouldn't resign, rather than at News International if she had gone right away.
 
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/n...16154603.html?r=RSS&google_editors_picks=true

Cardinal Sean Brady plans his exit strategy

An auxiliary bishop is to be appointed by the Vatican to work beside Cardinal Sean Brady as part of a carefully choreographed exit strategy for the head of the Catholic Church in Ireland.

The coadjutor bishop would be a senior Church figure who would act as the cardinal’s understudy in his role as Archbishop of Armagh, before eventually inheriting the role after a respectable amount of time had elapsed.

The furore over Cardinal Brady’s handling of child sex abuse allegations when he was a priest in the 1970s, which re-ignited this week, has taken a heavy toll on the Church leader.

He won’t be preaching over the weekend and is understood to be consulting his advisers.

The storm broke after a BBC documentary in which Brendan Boland, a victim of notorious paedophile Fr Brendan Smyth, revealed he had given Father Brady, then a canon lawyer, the names of other sex abuse victims during a Church inquiry into Smyth.

He never reported this to the police, saying that he was only a junior note-taker and that contacting the authorities was up to more senior clerics. Since then pressure from politicians for him to step down has been unrelenting.

Fr Vincent Twomey, professor emeritus of moral theology at Maynooth, where Ireland’s priests are trained, said the cardinal now lacks the authority to continue.

However, Cardinal Brady has already ruled out resigning.

He did so after receiving the endorsement of Rome, both privately and in a public statement by Monsignor Charles Scicluna.

The monsignor, whose title is ‘Promoter of Justice’, was appointed by Pope Benedict to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, known in medieval times as the Holy Inquisition.

He has overall responsibility for handling complaints of sexual abuse of minors and his words have papal approval.

“If you want to know how the Vatican thinks, look at history — how they dealt with these things in the past,” said Michael Kelly, the deputy editor of the Irish Catholic.

“They probably will appoint a coadjutor bishop with the right to succeed Cardinal Brady,” he said.

When Cardinal Brady faced similar pressure in 2010 after a UTV documentary, he asked Rome to appoint an auxiliary bishop, indicating he was willing to resign, but Pope Benedict gave him full support to continue.

At that time Cardinal Brady, who has high blood pressure, collapsed while giving children first communion in Kildress, Co Tyone, but later recovered. This time the case for appointing a coadjutor to work into the 73-year-old cardinal’s role is even stronger.

Cardinal Brady himself was appointed coadjutor archbishop to the ageing Cardinal Cahal Daly in 1995, and took over the reins completely a year later.

The same thing happened when Cardinal Archbishop Desmond Connell’s handling of child sex abuse claims in his Dublin diocese were scrutinised by an RTE documentary, Cardinal Secrets.

In 2003 Diarmuid Martin was appointed coadjutor archbishop, and a year later Cardinal Connell handed over to him.

Meanwhile, calls for the cardinal to step down have increased.

Helen McGonagle, a US lawyer abused by Smyth while he was a priest in East Greenwich, Rhode Island, said the cardinal must resign and be the subject of a criminal inquiry.

Martin McGuinness has again called on the cardinal to consider his position.

The Stormont Deputy First Minister said: “I don't think he realised it the other day. But I think he should realise it now, that he has a big decision to make.

“I hope he makes the right decision and I hope it's a decision which is recognising the suffering of those young people who were raped and sexually abused by Fr Brendan Smyth.”

It would appear the Vatican may just have made Cardinal Brady's decision for him.....
 
They should replace every single bishop in Ireland imo.
Start with a fresh lot who have proven themselves 'liked' and 'useful' in big parishes around the various dioceses around the island. Preferably after the 'Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith' has thoroughly investigated the past of each man.

Let the Church start afresh, completely. Lets not leave the past in the past but leave it when current faces don't keep bringing it back at people.
 
Back
Top Bottom