Are people not responsible for their own actions anymore?

[Efour]

People saying it's genocide.. concentration camps. Trump is Hitler....

Yet refugees come of their own free will to be exterminated? Some even drown to skip the queue for the "genocide."

Again I got banned from Facebook for 30 days for telling people they are insaine.

I am going to purge everything, everysite and everyone that holds a strongly left opinion on this nonsense.

I hope trump doesn't get reflected just so lunatics can calm down and the world can go back to hating Russia or the middle East more.

 

[Trusty]

The US literally has the most corrupt government (respective of previous admin.) perhaps ever, i don't think they can pass judgement like this again without looking like fools, constant obstruction of congress, constant maneuvers to pilfer money from other parts of the government to waste it on a generally worthless vanity project, constantly gerrymandering and applying restrictive voting laws statewide when it suits them usually to the distinct detriment of minorities (funny that and you wonder why they dont vote that way), running away from scrutiny at every juncture. Mexico might always have been a pretty roguish entity, but this is a hill that's now shared between them.

This doesn't excuse the democrats whenever they've partaken in idiocy, but generally it seems mostly one-sided.

https://www.transparency.org/cpi2018

 

[Dis86]

@Trusty Yeah but they're corrupt too so you can trust their survey. Just look, it shows Russia and China as being bad. That can't be true.

 

[vanillaface]

https://www.transparency.org/cpi2018

With the UK, did it include the bit where the government covered up the sexual enslavement of 250,000 to 1,000,000 English girls in order not to upset a voter base or appear "racist"?
Or the bit where a referendum was held to stay in a thing called a "Common Market", with the government saying at the time (now declassified) that it'll be decades before the people realise what they really voted for, and by then it'll be too late to reverse it?

We have our own method of corruption over here. It's different to the type you get in Ukraine or Russia, in which you pay a bribe to get a passport.

Speaking of which....
.... has anyone ever wondered about the "directorships" which often get handed out to outgoing government ministers when they leave office? The ones where they get £100,00 a year for one day's worth per month?

 

[Trusty]

With the UK, did it include the bit where the government covered up the sexual enslavement of 250,000 to 1,000,000 English girls in order not to upset a voter base or appear "racist"?
Or the bit where a referendum was held to stay in a thing called a "Common Market", with the government saying at the time (now declassified) that it'll be decades before the people realise what they really voted for, and by then it'll be too late to reverse it?

We have our own method of corruption over here. It's different to the type you get in Ukraine or Russia, in which you pay a bribe to get a passport.

Speaking of which....
.... has anyone ever wondered about the "directorships" which often get handed out to outgoing government ministers when they leave office? The ones where they get £100,00 a year for one day's worth per month?

Would that be classified as corruption though? or political correctness? I'm not sure. It's a fine line but i can see your side of it obviously.

 

[Werewolf]

With the UK, did it include the bit where the government covered up the sexual enslavement of 250,000 to 1,000,000 English girls in order not to upset a voter base or appear "racist"?

Do you actually read your posts and realise how stupid some of them sound?

250k to a million girls would be at the upper end of the range that's about half the school girls.

That sort of claim instantly puts anything else you say in doubt.

 

[Lord-Jaffa]

Do you actually read your posts and realise how stupid some of them sound?

250k to a million girls would be at the upper end of the range that's about half the school girls.

That sort of claim instantly puts anything else you say in doubt.

Depends on the time frame surely? Historic cases of authoritys ignoring grooming gangs back to the 70s/80s? Probably wouldn't be too far off the mark

 

[StriderX]

Mostly the fault of a failed/abusive child services system I'd hazard going by ex-cops, unfortunately there aren't many hard numbers on proportions of the affected, it also wasn't just grooming gangs that were ignored. Literal MP's were as well.

 

[vanillaface]

Would that be classified as corruption though? or political correctness? I'm not sure. It's a fine line but i can see your side of it obviously.

I would have thought corruption, since the councils involved (and Gordon Brown's government), covered it up to protect their voter base.
Or to put it another way, they traded these girls so that they could continue to get paid from the public tit.
Yup, it's corruption.

 

[vanillaface]

Do you actually read your posts and realise how stupid some of them sound?

250k to a million girls would be at the upper end of the range that's about half the school girls.

That sort of claim instantly puts anything else you say in doubt.

Well, Sarah Champion put the figure at 1,000,000. She was expelled from the Labour cabinet for pointing out that Pakistani men were raping English girls.
Lord Pearson put it at 250,000+.
The police, after the Rotherham scandal hit the papers, put it at more than 100,000.
The figures refer to English girls who were enslaved between 1970 and 2013.

I would imagine the figure would be in line with Lord Pearson's research. I can't see it being as high as Sarah Champion's estimate, surely.

When the Rotherham figure of 1400+ was released, someone calculated that each English girl aged 11-15 in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013 had a one in eleven chance of being enslaved. The figure was quietly revised upwards to 2500+ last year.

Sexual enslavement on this scale does not happen outside of wartime, which is exactly what it was. It was a form of warfare waged against the English kuffar. It's the tip of the iceberg compared to what is to come over the coming decades.

Trading hymens for votes, and yet our society is "civilised".
What's the proportion of Labour voters in this country? Would a decent person ever vote Labour again after what they did to those girls?

Democracy does not necessarily lead to good choices, but it does lead to responsibility. Just as a buyer of heroin is responsible for funding the Taliban, a LibLabCon voter is responsible for the mass rape of English girls.
Maybe there ought to be a special stupidity/evil tax on LibLabConners.