I thought that he might have been able to understand that nobody was questioning the originality of the medium...If I were, I would have said that chalks, pastels and paints aren't original.
*n
(Art) They do it deliberately....
- Thread starter AJUK
- Start date
I thought that he might have been able to understand that nobody was questioning the originality of the medium...If I were, I would have said that chalks, pastels and paints aren't original.
*n
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2006
- Posts
- 8,537
hate 'modern art', it's not 'art' it's accidents, give me landsacpes and portraits over all the modern crap
Because landscapes and portraits are so much deeper.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2006
- Posts
- 8,537
taking a picture and adding a description to give it some semblance or 'depth' is really deep as well i take it
The problem with the whole 'Is it art?' debate is that people confuse the question 'Is it art?' with 'Is it good art?'
A 2 year old can produce art, but most 2 year olds don't produce good art. Given the subjective nature of taste in art i would define art as anything that was designed to be art. That doesn't make it good art.
I would agree completely that if an artist makes it intending it to be art, then it is art. It just isn't necessarily any good.
A 2 year old can produce art, but most 2 year olds don't produce good art. Given the subjective nature of taste in art i would define art as anything that was designed to be art. That doesn't make it good art.
SB118 said:
I would agree completely that if an artist makes it intending it to be art, then it is art. It just isn't necessarily any good.
Last edited:
he uses existing 'idea's and themes' on an original canvas. Putting a few twigs in a room and leaving it isnt original, canadians do it all the time for their wood stocks.
If I've got a low IQ its only riding at he same level as your level of comprehension.