Asylum map of Britain

Status
Not open for further replies.
vonhelmet said:
Immigrants? You mean like my mother? The immigrant who has been gainfully employed since she arrived and who I'd wager speaks better English than you? Please pick a more accurate term with which to generalise, unless you really want to kick every last person out of this country.
I couldn't give a flying **** what your mother does. At the end of the day, she is in a immigrant. It's as black and white as this: she's an immigrant, or she's not an immigrant.

To be perfectly honest with you, I feel this country has enough burdons of it's own, without having to cater for it's own people.
 
basmic said:
I couldn't give a flying **** what your mother does. At the end of the day, she is in a immigrant. It's as black and white as this: she's an immigrant, or she's not an immigrant.

So my mother should leave? And me with her? Why? She contributes to the system, as do I.

What exactly is your reasoning for saying immigrants should leave? Is it because they are immigrants, or because you believe they contribute nothing to the system, but rather sap it? What about an immigrant who contributes to the system?

I fear logic is absent from your thinking on this matter.
 
basmic said:
I couldn't give a flying **** what your mother does. At the end of the day, she is in a immigrant.

A you a full-blood native? Are you parents? Their parents and their parents before them? Can you trace your family line back to Mr England, who happened to chance across this great country and blessed it with his name?
 
@if ®afiq said:
A you a full-blood native? Are you parents? Their parents and their parents before them? Can you trace your family line back to Mr England, who happened to chance across this great country and blessed it with his name?

You dont need a lineage to be English, but it can help
 
cleanbluesky said:
You dont need a lineage to be English, but it can help

I think the point is more a question of "How English is English?" Somewhere back in the line we're all immigrants to some degree or another, so just where do we draw the line?
 
vonhelmet said:
I think the point is more a question of "How English is English?" Somewhere back in the line we're all immigrants to some degree or another, so just where do we draw the line?
We can draw the line wherever we want, we were here first so ner ner ner.
 
Rich_L said:
We can draw the line wherever we want, we were here first so ner ner ner.

Weren't the Celts there first so basically if you arnt a Celt you really are an immigrant :p
 
vonhelmet said:
I think the point is more a question of "How English is English?" Somewhere back in the line we're all immigrants to some degree or another, so just where do we draw the line?

It depends whether you mean racially or ethnically English. At least 50% of ethnic minorities I have discussed sch issues with do not consider themselves English or British, more often than not they consider themselves West Indian/African/Pakistani etc... before British...

Such a rule of thumb seems appropriate for me, there will always be exceptions to this of course - but as a rough guide it seems fine...
 
if he's from darlington..chances are his family is either from north of the border or probably has scandinavian roots..most of the original angles/saxons lived further south..we were all picts up here...and then the vikings turned up and settled

me? my ancestors hark back to north of the border
 
Rich_L said:
We can draw the line wherever we want, we were here first so ner ner ner.


Well *I* can trace my lineage back to some primordial slime 120 million years ago in a puddle near Swindon, so nerrr......
 
Zip said:
Weren't the Celts there first so basically if you arnt a Celt you really are an immigrant :p

No, this country was de-regionalised by Caesar - therefore anyone WASP, Celt, Pict (I think) or even Gaulish are free to call themselves English...
 
cleanbluesky said:
It depends whether you mean racially or ethnically English. At least 50% of ethnic minorities I have discussed sch issues with do not consider themselves English or British, more often than not they consider themselves West Indian/African/Pakistani etc... before British...

Such a rule of thumb seems appropriate for me, there will always be exceptions to this of course - but as a rough guide it seems fine...

Whatever. My point is that people argue and bitch about how immigrants don't integrate and don't contribute to the system and so on. This is a ludicrous generalisation as plenty of immigrants do all these things. On the other hand, plenty of homegrown British people are lazy scroungers who live in cesspit ghetto council estates. So, do we chuck out the immigrants, some of whom work and are useful, or the lazy scroungers, some of whom are British born and bred? Here's a revolutionary idea! COMPLAIN ABOUT THE SCROUNGERS!
 
But it's the immigrants' fault that we have native scroungers because THEY TOOK OUR JOBS!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom