• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ati or nvidia ***

peetee said:
who cares, there both ridiculously fast and does 5-10fps really make that different depending on which game your playing? serious, DOES IT? they play things at ridiculous FPS anyway

lol.... before i changed the computer i was pretty used to 15-20fps in games. so really i cant go wrong from now on.

unless i get an x1300 and get 1fps in fear (ati still own)
 
im sure in time it'll improve after driver releases and the new 1900 will be a more worthy opponent. Im under the impression that crossfire is more effective than SLi also, is it true that the CPU must process all the data twice and then feed it 2 each graphics card? If crossfire works more efficiently than this It could be more effective at reducing how much the CPU bottlenecks the graphics card, although i havnt really educated myself yet much on either SLI or crossfire this is just my uneducated understanding of it at the moment :)
 
peetee said:
Im under the impression that crossfire is more effective than SLi
ummm i thought SLi was more efficient.. :confused: isnt crossfire limited to 1600 res? which pretty much elimiates the reason to get dual cards imo :o

oooo and i went from a 9200SE to a 7800GTX :D

nVIDIA for the win :D :D
 
naffa said:
ummm i thought SLi was more efficient.. :confused: isnt crossfire limited to 1600 res? which pretty much elimiates the reason to get dual cards imo :o

oooo and i went from a 9200SE to a 7800GTX :D

nVIDIA for the win :D :D

only with the x850 cards
 
Back
Top Bottom