Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

BillytheImpaler said:Is it not silly to spend such large amounts of money on an extremely high-end card when the new Direct3D version will make them obsolete in just a few months?
BillytheImpaler said:Is it not silly to spend such large amounts of money on an extremely high-end card when the new Direct3D version will make them obsolete in just a few months?


theres no need to get a DX10 card until about a year or more from now
But those new cards will run dx9 much faster shouldnt they. Probably will cost the same as well. personally i am waiting for those cards instead of splasjing out now.dale1uk said:Ture, but why bother getting one of the first wave of dx10 cards when there'll be no/VERY few games to support it?? Its a hard call, I wouldn't do it, but some people have the cash to upgrade every generation. I'll be sticking with my x1800 till dx10 establishes itself and then I'll upgrade.

Datamonkey said:dx10 cards wont run dx9 faster as far as im aware,

JackRegan said:Anyone who is testing Vista will say the same. Even if Vista is released Jan 07 it will be 6mths before enough of the bugs are ironed out for games to start making full use of DX10 and by this time there will be a whole new line of cards out. JMO
Jack

Aye, ATI have said that R600 will be the fastest DirectX 9 card ever made when it's out. With their track record as of late, I'm inclined to believe them too.LoadsaMoney said:R600 will as far as i know.![]()
LoadsaMoney said:R600 will as far as i know.![]()


They're not milking anyone, just an update, you'll pay just about the same for a slightly faster card in late august as you would have for an x1900 when they were released. Also x1950's might clock better. Nobody forces you to buy these and it's nice to have the choice.LoadsaMoney said:Doesn't sound much of an increase 10%-15% over the x1900 XTX, certainly not worth the extra over it consideing now you can get the x1900's for £211, and these x1950's are supposed to be around £350+, thats over £130+ extra for a measly 10%-15%, what a rip, i can't really see the need to keep milking everyone with these speedbumped cards that are hardly any faster than the previous card, yet cost about £150 more.
kdd said:They're not milking anyone, just an update, you'll pay just about the same for a slightly faster card in late august as you would have for an x1900 when they were released. Also x1950's might clock better. Nobody forces you to buy these and it's nice to have the choice.



That makes no sense!LoadsaMoney said:Yeah i agree its nice to have a choice, and the x1950 will only benefit those with lower end cards, if you have an x1900 etc... already then i can't see a point getting a one, but there will be ppl with high end cards like the x1900 already that will as they have to have the top end card regardless, and thats why speedbumped cards with their measly increases come out all the time, as they know they are going to sell regardless, and they can milk us for some more cash.![]()