17 Nov 2008 at 16:13 #21 [TW]Fox [TW]Fox Man of Honour Joined 17 Oct 2002 Posts 160,293 subaru_swift said: get the 1.9 TDI remap it then it will be a all round nice motor. Click to expand... No it'll be a noisy slow diesel, the 2.0T is loads better.
subaru_swift said: get the 1.9 TDI remap it then it will be a all round nice motor. Click to expand... No it'll be a noisy slow diesel, the 2.0T is loads better.
17 Nov 2008 at 16:54 #22 swyllie2000 swyllie2000 Associate Joined 20 Sep 2008 Posts 260 Why would you choose a oil burner?
17 Nov 2008 at 18:44 #23 Mr109 Mr109 Associate Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 797 Location Stafford Having just traded my 2.0t, I can vouch for it as an engine. I was getting 38mpg on a run and 33-35 average, and there's plenty of power for most circumstances. It even manages to sound OK when rev'd. Al
Having just traded my 2.0t, I can vouch for it as an engine. I was getting 38mpg on a run and 33-35 average, and there's plenty of power for most circumstances. It even manages to sound OK when rev'd. Al
17 Nov 2008 at 19:53 #24 SpeedFreak SpeedFreak Soldato OP Joined 14 Nov 2002 Posts 7,782 Location Under the Hill Wow, beats my current car which gets less than 30 lol. I will look into the 2005 2.0T and the 3.0 tdi as well. Thanks again for all your help.
Wow, beats my current car which gets less than 30 lol. I will look into the 2005 2.0T and the 3.0 tdi as well. Thanks again for all your help.