AVG or NOD32

ATIorNvidia · 13 Sep 2006 at 21:01

NOD32 all the way

gizmoy2k · 13 Sep 2006 at 22:10

afraser2k said:
He's using the paid version though, which updates a lot quicker.

Its not about how quickly it updates its about how it protects and detects!

As i said you can have a fully updated version of AVG and nothing, Install NOD32 after it anod you could find 10 suspect files.
IMO you might aswell have nothing OR AVG. Its the same thing !

pieman109 · 14 Sep 2006 at 00:31

Got a twin license of Nod32 here for two computers, Everyone I've recommended it to swears by it now, better than anything I've used in the past. And it hardly uses any resources as far as I can tell.

Curio · 14 Sep 2006 at 01:08

Gave up on AVG after it recently failed to deal with a virus which resulted in two of my computers requiring complete re-installs :mad:

Am trying Avast now instead - so far so good...

mattbrown91 · 14 Sep 2006 at 07:08

I'm a firm believer in NOD32

CurlyWhirly · 15 Sep 2006 at 16:23

NOD32 fan here as well

killer_uk · 15 Sep 2006 at 16:36

CurlyWhirly said:
NOD32 fan here as well

KennyBhoy · 15 Sep 2006 at 21:21

CurlyWhirly said:
NOD32 fan here as well

And heeeeeeeeeeeere! :cool:

Gas Panic! · 15 Sep 2006 at 22:28

I use Norton at the moment (I know, I know :/) but will be installing NOD32 when I get my new HDD.

Day03 · 15 Sep 2006 at 22:30

I've been using NOD32 for a very long time and never had any problems with it. I can certainly recommend it.

joeyjojo · 15 Sep 2006 at 23:10

nod32 > avg

but, mksvir > nod32 (apparently

)

Edit: though other tests suggest f-secure