Bandwidth Hogging

The UK average is 65Mbps or something like that. I only have access to a service delivered via an Openreach phone line, fortunately it delivers 70Mbps and while I'd take an FTTP service were it available there's nothing I *can't* do on this connection that going faster would allow.

Importantly, as people have already said, upgrading to a 200Mbps service won't stop the console updates from impacting on other services. This problem can be solved quickly with a router that supports traffic management, for a relatively small cost.
 
The UK average is 65Mbps or something like that. I only have access to a service delivered via an Openreach phone line, fortunately it delivers 70Mbps and while I'd take an FTTP service were it available there's nothing I *can't* do on this connection that going faster would allow.

Importantly, as people have already said, upgrading to a 200Mbps service won't stop the console updates from impacting on other services. This problem can be solved quickly with a router that supports traffic management, for a relatively small cost.

You can’t stream a high bit-rate 4K REMUX on 70Mbit... I tried to resist, I really did :D
 
Why exactly don’t we know what products are compatible with his EE router? They’re just another OR re-seller that happen to be BT owned. I can see why you say what you say, and I’m glad it’s working for you, but that’s not how bandwidth generally works unless you have a disproportionately large pipe and/or the external servers you are pulling data from can’t saturate it. As op is on FTTC, he’s likely one of the overwhelming majority (its claimed to be 65%ish from memory, but that ignored overbuild, and between OR, VM and alt-net you have a lot of overbuild) who haven’t got options for a faster service yet. Even if he did, without QoS it’s likely he will run into the same problem sooner or later, that’s why prioritising latency sensitive traffic is a better idea than what you suggest. Extra bandwidth doesn’t solve everything, I can have the same problem with a remote 10Gb WAN set-up if I don’t manage it.

Of course there are better long term solutions. I was giving the OP zero cost and simple solutions.

The OP asked :

suggest if there is a work around without the need to buy a router
 
You can’t stream a high bit-rate 4K REMUX on 70Mbit... I tried to resist, I really did :D

odd i thought 4k stuff didnt exceed 25mbit for streaming services. but then i guess if your watching a video and someones pc decides to do windows updates on the sly thats gonna hot some bandwidth too and may cause stutter.
 
odd i thought 4k stuff didnt exceed 25mbit for streaming services. but then i guess if your watching a video and someones pc decides to do windows updates on the sly thats gonna hot some bandwidth too and may cause stutter.

The critical bit of what I said was 4K REMUX, the bit-rate of a 4K BRD can spike at 100Mbit.
 
wouldnt really say 80mbit is decent in this day and age. :D

I went from 80Mbps/20Mbps to 140Mbps/20Mbps with G.Fast to 910/110Mbps with FTTP and in general use I don't see much difference. My offsite backup finishes MUCH faster because of the significantly faster upload speed but unless I'm downloading an ISO or something I don't really feel the speed difference. 80Mbps is perfectly adequate for most people.
 
Back
Top Bottom