thats the whole point most people are fools on foot.
you shouldnt be able to repair inside.
it should be slower.
less damage.
also more weapons capable to take out tanks.
the problem is,many public player wont play with mentality of lets take out the tank.they look at their KD ratio and run.when any person knows if you work together they are not to hard to take down.
that needs factoring in.the public noob factor.
I agree with you on the shouldn't be able to repair inside (this one in particular I think is a bit silly) and it could do with being slower. I wouldn't want to see more weapons capable of taking out tanks though, there are already AT mines, AT grenades, the AT Rocket Gun, the static Cannons, other tanks and planes. I feel if there were any more then tanks would become pretty worthless, whereas in WW1 they should be scary things.
I will tell you what I don't understand though about the public player..in BF4, you see an enemy tank and what do you see next, a whole load of public players swapping to Engineer and using various lock on and non-lock AT weapons and so on. What you don't see in BF4, is a whole load of players trying to run around the tank throwing nades at it. For me, the problem doesn't lie with the tanks or the AT weapons, it lies with some peculiar difference in mentality between those BF4 players who go get an AT weapon class and the ones in BF1 beta who just don't.
Last edited:
