——The Official Battlefield 6 Thread——
- Thread starter Neil79
- Start date
Little annoyed I've not had a play test invite, Completed the the form early days. Even answered the email survey they sent out and have all the BF games in my account. Guess they didn't like the answers to the survey
Might be in your spam folder
Little annoyed I've not had a play test invite, Completed the the form early days. Even answered the email survey they sent out and have all the BF games in my account. Guess they didn't like the answers to the survey
Same here but im not expecting much from this game.
DICE have completely lost it over the years..
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 5,018
- Location
- Blackburn
They did say people would be selected at random. Whether you've played every Battlefield since 1942 or none of the games is irrelevant according to DICELittle annoyed I've not had a play test invite, Completed the the form early days. Even answered the email survey they sent out and have all the BF games in my account. Guess they didn't like the answers to the survey
it what made battlefield different and fun
run and gun is old but killing a whole squad with a house is fun
I'd hope we see complete buildings collapse with BF6, considering the Finals can do it with every single building on every single map you'd hope they'd potentially look to mirror that.
Go ahead and post it, been other vids posted here.
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 5,018
- Location
- Blackburn
It's not a case of they couldn't do but was a design choice with previous BF games. On Bad Company 2 it could become almost impossible for the attacking team once the map was levelled.
Saying that though I'm all for full building destruction because it was fun. Having to dive out of a winder when you felt the building rumble and you know it was coming down .
Last edited:
the damage looks totally unrealistic and detracts from my perception of immersion.
seen too many buildings in Ukraine take missiles have have like 5-10% of the damage this game is showing
they fall apart like someone made them out of cardboard and used no glue
also theres massive peices of concrete flying off that would kill you or leave a crater in the ground, but they just disappear.
other games near 20 years ago had better damage physics
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 9 May 2022
- Posts
- 2,302
- Location
- London
BFBC had great destruction, then about half way though a round the entire map would be flat and gameplay became about as fun as you’d expect a flattened map with no buildings left to be….
Last edited:
I couldn't stop thinking if rubble could be used to bury a nearby vehicle. Maybe to kill mobility or at least visibility
But agree, the destruction is way too big for the tiny explosive amount
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 5,018
- Location
- Blackburn
There were other videos showing the destruction and when I the front of the building was blown off you could climb up the fallen rumble and enter the building. No idea if was physics based or just a scripted destruction animation though.
Looks cool but a single RPG blowing the entire side of a building off in a single hit is a bit over the top. Should be a few hits atleast
Looks cool but a single RPG blowing the entire side of a building off in a single hit is a bit over the top. Should be a few hits atleast
Last edited:
It's a game not RL. People spent the last 4 years complaining not enough destruction in BF. They put it in, now ppl complaining it's too much!
You can please some of the people some of the time…
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 5,018
- Location
- Blackburn
The destruction isn't too much, just too easily destroyed I guess