BBC 911 conspiracy?

[Glaucus]

'Blantantly'? So this is your opinion then and not the factual evidence you were implying?...and basing your whole argument on i may add.

And i don't know whether a missle can knock down street lamps, do you? They're pretty tough, fast moving objects them missiles...i wouldn't expect a street lamp to put up much resistance to one.

shhh you making your self sound like a CT believer. With out knowing the facts.

Yes I do know a missile cant cut down a series of street lamps. The wings on a missile are at maximum a few feet. So how does a missile cut down street lamps that are 10's pf yards apart?

How does a missile leave engine debris and other plane debris in the pentagon? How does it leave a plane on a security camera?

Jow does it blow a hole in the wall with dimensions of a plane.

None of these points do you need to be a scientists to work out. It's common sense. So yes the conspiracy theorists lie.

that is but one point to show my argument, I base my finidings on a hell of a lot more. why dont you research the computer models I'm talking about. I even think one of the uk channels did a documentary on how the towers collpased which included *** scientists and *** computer models.

 

[iCraig]

And i don't know whether a missle can knock down street lamps, do you? They're pretty tough, fast moving objects them missiles...i wouldn't expect a street lamp to put up much resistance to one.

Unless the missile zig-zagged across the road several times hitting the lamp posts on either side and then straightening up again to hit the pentagon, then no, it wasn't a missile.

 

[churned]

The theories that really are pointless speculating are the BBC and Pentagon missile ones, but the thing as a whole is definitely farfetched...

 

[Werewolf]

The theories that really are pointless speculating are the BBC and Pentagon missile ones, but the thing as a whole is definitely farfetched...

but not as farfetched as the conspiracy theories that suggest that not only was the government able to commit such an act, on such a large and public scale, involving tens of thousands of eyewitnesses and hundreds/thousands of people directly involved in the conspiracy without it leaking, and still have the resulting collapse of the twin towers go in accordance to how later independent studies suggest it would go (unless they rigged multiple large scale studies by engineers/universities involving hundreds more people).

 

[iCraig]

The theories that really are pointless speculating are the BBC and Pentagon missile ones, but the thing as a whole is definitely farfetched...

The theory of a cruise missile hitting the Pentagon is usually coupled with the theories of thermite bringing the towers down etc.

Sometimes I really believe the conspiracy theorists just sit and make stuff up, living in their own dream world of what they reckon could have happened. Evidence and stuff isn't important.

 

[iCraig]

I was just watching a video which featured a clip of 9/11 and something clicked as I watched it.

If the towers collapse at free fall speed, why is the debris coming off them falling faster than the tower itself? If you watch, the debris flying off as it pancakes billows down through the air and lands much sooner than the rest of the tower?

How can something falling unaided, fall faster than free fall velocity?