Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Dec 2005
- Posts
- 12,488
- Location
- Bath
Despite all the ITV hate back in the day (and their F1 coverage was crap in comparison with the BBC), ITV did manage to get Downton Abbey right...
[DOD]Asprilla;19631938 said:I read 'No' and the rest doesn't really matter does it?
Similarly I could say that the BBC has policies that must be complied to when it comes to contract signing and whilst BBC commercial managers may want to sign a deal whatever the contract says their corporate lawyers will simply not allow it. One of these is that the contract must have an exit clause or the capacity to be terminated early.
Actually the rest does matter, there are things lawyers can't do. You either accept the terms or you don't own the rights, simple as.
[DOD]Asprilla;19632058 said:You've already said you've not seen the contract and yet you are so staggeringly sure of what in it. Strange.
surprisingly you don't always need to see the contract. You can go read up on bernie and tv rights and see what he has said for a start.
Let's wait and see. I guarantee that if they don't sell the rights they will continue broadcasting, as otherwise bernie will win all their license fee and then some in compensation(maybe slightly exaggerated) but the point is that the punishment is so harsh they would continue broadcasting. They could cut the introduction and features and still broadcast the race to save money.
Keep Angry Boys and Family Guy though. Rest can go.
Was going to say the same thing, there are plenty of channels that will pick up non BBC material no trouble.I’m sure Channel 4 would happily take Family Guy off their hands, which would save them some cash.
BBC3 and BBC4 should merge or simply drop them. Radio channels such as Radio 1 Xtra should go, Radio 1 plays most of their stuff anyway.
[DOD]Asprilla;19631208 said:I wish I lived in your world where everything was so simple and so black and white.
I am glad i don't live in your naive world where you think any organization that's revenue comes from misappropriation will ever be able to adequately spend the money. The BBC is a thieving, propagandist based organization that should be put to death. There is nothing good that comes out of the £4 billion in misappropriated funds. if they are so good then what is the problem with making it voluntary? If there are so many English license players that love the BBC propaganda then they will continue to pay for it.
You can't even own a TV without paying money to the BBC. That should be a crime to any principled person.
I am glad i don't live in your naive world where you think any organization that's revenue comes from misappropriation will ever be able to adequately spend the money. The BBC is a thieving, propagandist based organization that should be put to death. There is nothing good that comes out of the £4 billion in misappropriated funds. if they are so good then what is the problem with making it voluntary? If there are so many English license players that love the BBC propaganda then they will continue to pay for it.
You can't even own a TV without paying money to the BBC. That should be a crime to any principled person.
You can't even own a TV without paying money to the BBC. That should be a crime to any principled person.
trying to watch telly on most countries is a painful experience
Well Andy Parfitt is leaving so that is a saving of £211,000 per year
Feel free to browse the salary's of the senior staff on the BBC here -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/running/bbcstructure/az.shtml
Perhaps the license fee could be reduced so that it covers only BBC news coverage (not necessarily rolling news). They would receive funding regardless of whether they were competing well against commercial news outlets. The focus would be on unbiased coverage of a broad spectrum of events.My heart bleeds for them... Perhaps if they hadn't been designed to be reliant on taxpayer's money and continue to be funded irrespective of whether they were producing the goods or not (which isn't to say that everything the Beeb produces is bad) then they wouldn't be in quite the same position.
You can't even own a TV without paying money to the BBC. That should be a crime to any principled person.