BBC License fee

Man of Honour
Joined
28 Nov 2007
Posts
12,736
BBC worldwide is the commercial arm of the BBC and sells programmes, products etc., including internationally and should not be confused with you subsidising anything - in fact BBC worldwide subsidises the BBC with it's profits. personally I think the BBC represents great value for money.
 
Permabanned
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
12,841
Location
Lost!
Scrap the license fee, im sick of paying for them to spank money on knobs like Johnathan Ross and make crap TV and radio programs.

It should be run like any other commercial enterprise and privately funded, if that means adverts in breaks then so what, i dont care or object to that, i do object to the obscene fee we are forced to pay.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
28 Nov 2007
Posts
12,736
Scrap the license fee, im sick of paying for them to spank money on knobs like Johnathan Ross and make crap TV and radio programs.

It should be run like any other commercial enterprise and privately funded, if that means adverts in breaks then so what, i dont care or object to that, i do object to the obscene fee we are forced to pay.

it's not any other commercial enterprise, since it's not commercial

God forbid all news in this country was like Sky's - that would be commercial and it would suck balls. The BBC does a great job and jumping on the Jonathan Ross is paid too much thing is not to look at the big picture - he is paid the going rate comensurate with the number of viewers and listnerers he generates.
 
Permabanned
Joined
2 Oct 2008
Posts
1,069
Scrap the license fee, im sick of paying for them to spank money on knobs like Johnathan Ross and make crap TV and radio programs.

It should be run like any other commercial enterprise and privately funded, if that means adverts in breaks then so what, i dont care or object to that, i do object to the obscene fee we are forced to pay.
I detest adverts. It's great that we can sit down and watch the BBC without having to sit through bloody adverts.
 
Permabanned
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
12,841
Location
Lost!
it's not any other commercial enterprise, since it's not commercial

God forbid all news in this country was like Sky's - that would be commercial and it would suck balls. The BBC does a great job and jumping on the Jonathan Ross is paid too much thing is not to look at the big picture - he is paid the going rate comensurate with the number of viewers and listnerers he generates.

I never said they were commercial, i said they SHOULD be, and hence no license fee to pay and them being operated like a proper company not from my pocket.

JR isnt a band wagon, he's a pompus fool who is grossly overpaid (along with footballers but thankfully i dont contribute to their wages), there is nothing comensurate about his salery, the "standard" by which he is paid is dictated by the industry he is in, which is a self governing pit of corruption who take money from tax payers and dont actually have to justify it hence the vast quantity of grossly overinflated saleries (and egos) at the BBC.
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Nov 2008
Posts
8,726
Location
UK
Just like you pay for the NHS whether or not you use it, you pay for the BBC. It is a public service - programs for the minority. If you let the majority dictate TV (if the BBC was ad-funded), we'd get crap. Fewer documentaries, less news, less debate and fewer educational programs.

Stop whining, and go watch Britain's Got Talent.
 
Last edited:
Permabanned
Joined
28 Oct 2006
Posts
6,552
Location
Bournemouth
... and what do you call all the rubbish the Beeb show between programs. ;)

It's not mid programme though! I can watch the f1 without adverts now...brilliant! Jonathan Ross, why do people hate him? I think his Friday night show is well good. Have i got news for you is also very good, lets not forgot the mighty QI as well. Good shows like Reggie Perrin. BBC is ace!
 
Man of Honour
Joined
11 Mar 2004
Posts
76,634
I detest paying for license but I have to, with SKY+ or other PVR's I dont need to, I very rarely watch anything live now.

yes you do. using sky+ or pvr technology instantl;y means you have to pay for a license.


Iplayer is not available abroad and they sale tv rights to foreign countries. Radio and website IIRC are not paid for by the license fee.
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Nov 2003
Posts
14,034
Location
Surrey, by the river
iPlayer isn't available outside the UK

BBC.com carries advertising and is the version that is availble overseas.

Overseas BBC channels are run by BBC Worldwide which is a wholely owned and profitable subsidiary.

The World Service is funded by a grant from the FCO.

I suppose ITV and the like just have cheaper idiots.

You think that Ant & Dec and the judges from BGT are cheap? Half an episode of BGT costs more than an entire series of The South Bank Show (which has just been canned)
 
Last edited:
Associate
OP
Joined
26 Nov 2006
Posts
1,091
yes you do. using sky+ or pvr technology instantl;y means you have to pay for a license.


Iplayer is not available abroad and they sale tv rights to foreign countries. Radio and website IIRC are not paid for by the license fee.

I was referring to not having to watch adverts

It was always a case that the BBC's Radio programs were funded by the license fee. I always remember Chris overpaid Moyles ranting on about the license fee paying for more than just TV.
 
Back
Top Bottom