FishPolice said:Yeah that would make sense.
What is annoying though is that the office supplies company took the £187 out of my account on the 6th Sept but did not actually despatch the goods (ink cartridges) as they became suspicious. Why then did they not refund the card straight away? Presumably they have had it sat in an account gaining interest for them whilst awaiting contact from "the customer" or a fraud investigation team.
When will banks get their acts together? I mean where I work I sometimes need to take card payments from customers. It would be so easy to glance at the back of the card to see the last 3 digits of the security number. We always have the customer's address details on file already. The customer gets his copy of the receipt, we keep the other copy. So following one of these transactions I could very easily have a card number & expiry date, the card security digits, the customer name & address. Now all I need is an online company who will despatch goods to an address different to the billing address. This is insane. What are the banks thinking of?...
AT the end of the day, any given security measure will only be put in place if it saves more money than it costs.
It was only when fraud reach high levels that Chip n pin was introduced, for example - there's nothing inherent in that system that couldnt have been done a decade earlier - it was just that it wasnt worth it.


