Associate
- Joined
- 26 May 2004
- Posts
- 1,126
- Location
- Carshalton, Surrey.
In the end, who cares, get the best of both worlds by having both!
Agreed

In the end, who cares, get the best of both worlds by having both!
1. Offline multiplayer (split screen).
2. Backwards compatability (could be argued either way though tbh).
3. Just put the cd/dvd in and it just 'works'.
4. No drivers to **** about with.
5. Cheaper than a PC.
I would still argue PC gaming is better though any day!
1. Ease of use, everything just works with minimal user effort. Same with online play
2. Titles that don't appear on PC
3. Local multiplayer
4. XBLA/PSN - greatest part of this gen for me
5. Kinect - It offers something different and is a lot of fun alone or with others.
And for the record I have a very good PC too, it fulfils a whole other set of pro's and imo you need both to experience everything.
That's a mute point
The expression you are looking for is MOOT point.
/selffacepalm
there is one benefit that outweighs all pc arguments to me which is:
i can sit on my couch infront of a 42" screen in extreme comfort which is what i want after a day at work, not sat on a computer chair at a desk
It's not about 'which is better?', it's more of a 'which suits my needs better?' and only you can answer that.
You can do that with a pc and wireless controller or mouse/keyboard
Yes because everyone keeps their bleeding edge gaming PC in the living room or can be bothered moving it everytime they want to play a game.
there is one benefit that outweighs all pc arguments to me which is:
i can sit on my couch infront of a 42" screen in extreme comfort which is what i want after a day at work, not sat on a computer chair at a desk
I second that