The main benefit for such a small installation to be virtualised is scalability, you can add additional VMs going forward should you grow and have other requirements. The other is separation of roles, what do you plan on putting on this server? That would give us more indication of any potential benefits.
Speed of reboots would be a definate plus![]()
Yeah, I kind of thought that anyone looking at virtualising a single server platform wouldn't have huge swathes of ECC RAM to do a POST on each time haha - unlike the fact that I was having to reboot SR650s with 1.5TB RAM every few days not long ago, what a nightmare that was waiting for the POST.
The main benefit for such a small installation to be virtualised is scalability, you can add additional VMs going forward should you grow and have other requirements. The other is separation of roles, what do you plan on putting on this server? That would give us more indication of any potential benefits.
It is just used for AD, print/file server.
It's all down to cost. If it's one server install bare metal, if you go virtual you need backups and alsorts and cannot justify with only 8 users.
Ad is a good idea in a larger company or if you need uber security.. For an average company with less than 10 staff go for a shared drive on a windows workstation.. assuming you just want a shared drive anyone can access..
So you don't need backups on bare metal? I'm not convinced of your logic there.
If you just have 8 staff how have you determined that you need a server and associated licensing?
As a registered charity we get a massive discount on Microsoft Server.
We actually already have the bare metal install of 2019 with all the server roles I mentioned and have no issues but I saw that someone who has a very similar setup to us have a server with Server 2019 installed as the o/s and then a Server 2019 VM for all the roles I mentioned which made me wonder what the benefits of doing it this way was.