I have a Samsung ue43ks7500 that i've been happy with since I purchased
i had the same dilemma as you and it came down to 2 tv's the sony or the LG.
LG has IPS panel so better viewing angles so I opted for it over the sony. if in your environment everyone views the tv head on then get the sony.
I got the 43" UH750V. Has a glass panel, brilliant onboard sound. HDR (8 bit with dithering).
I believe the HDR is slightly better on the sony but it doesn't have very good viewing angles. Colours go funny from an angle.
which is still £100 cheaper than the equivalent sony @ £999
the 43" market only has 1 clear winner the KS7500 but it's curved which I can't have. all the others are 8 bit with or without dithering.
personally i would wait it out another 2 months see what the new models bring. old ones will fall in price too.
Those Sony's linked above are 10-bit panels, not 8-bit. XD is last years model, XE is this years. I don't think there are any "in the wild" comparisons with the newer XE yet but initial info suggests that they will pretty much be the same performance-wise, rather than an obvious step-up.
I have the Sony KD43XD8088 and as far as I'm aware it is 10bit. There are lots of conflicting reports of it being 8+2. Rtings updated its review to show it being a true 10 bit tv but it still doesn't hit the UHDpremium standard.
And it's a bloody great TV for the money though.
No, as above they are the same model. The last two digits (77/88) refer to the colour, which is the only difference.
43XD8088
Red = size
Yellow = model
Green = colour
very subjective point.
like i said it depends how long your planning to keep the tv for and how much value you associate to £350.
me personally, I would say no. It's 50% more for less than even 20% improvement. However if your the type of person that buys a tv once every 10+ years. Then it's probably worth going for the newer set as you should get the best you can afford in that sort of situation. if you upgrade regularly then get the best bang for buck.
Those Sony sets can be had for 599 now at Very.
Is that a decent price for what you get?
I take it paying similar for say a 49" would get me a worse TV?
what do you have now ? since have not seen any ~40" 4k's I would switch too, so will probably run it into the ground.
missed that
with size limitation I am not convinced you will improve much on your existing one - technology improvements being directed to bigger sets
- ironically ju7100 from same year as yours seems maybe last 120hz ~40" panels and might have improved motion issue ... change your room layout to accomodate a bigger set.