• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Best Thermal Compound

If you've not had any spillage when using liquid metal on top your IHS then you did it correctly! You didn't use too much of the stuff.

If you start off with the recommended amount then you can't really go wrong. Unlike some of the videos the current formulation of Conductonaut didn't for me require any working to get moving, it is very liquid. I stood the monoblock on end overnight and none of the application dripped off.
 
If you start off with the recommended amount then you can't really go wrong. Unlike some of the videos the current formulation of Conductonaut didn't for me require any working to get moving, it is very liquid. I stood the monoblock on end overnight and none of the application dripped off.

I confirm what safetytrousers said.

Using Thermal Grizzly condactonaut for years with GPUs and delided Intel CPUs. If you follow the rules to apply it, is safe. (especially the rule NEVER PUT THE BLOB DIRECTLY TO THE SURFACE, ALWAYS ON A PLASTIC MEDIUM AND TRANSFER IT)
 
I have used arctic silver for two decades at least (it seems), I have just ordered some more AS5. It has always performed well for me, is easy to apply and easy to remove and clean off.

It is likely to be within a degree or two of the best.
 
I'll never understand this obsession people have with knocking 2-3 degrees off their temps by using fancy conductive pastes, just buy some MX-4 in the massive tube and be happy?
 
I'll never understand this obsession people have with knocking 2-3 degrees off their temps by using fancy conductive pastes, just buy some MX-4 in the massive tube and be happy?

^

You need to really make an effort to get paste which is meaningfully worse than the "best" paste. A couple of degrees even if honestly reported is irrelevant to the performance of the computer.

Liquid metal is meaningfully better at temps but if it's not letting you get performance you wouldn't normally have then... big deal?
 
I'll never understand this obsession people have with knocking 2-3 degrees off their temps by using fancy conductive pastes, just buy some MX-4 in the massive tube and be happy?

^

You need to really make an effort to get paste which is meaningfully worse than the "best" paste. A couple of degrees even if honestly reported is irrelevant to the performance of the computer.

Liquid metal is meaningfully better at temps but if it's not letting you get performance you wouldn't normally have then... big deal?

There is also user skill which may knock off a couple of degrees, but yes that is why I stay with what I know, Arctic silver.
 
I have used arctic silver for two decades at least (it seems), I have just ordered some more AS5. It has always performed well for me, is easy to apply and easy to remove and clean off.

It is likely to be within a degree or two of the best.
With overall rather small performance difference margin, even the best paste would likely perform well below average, if badly applied.
So for use of average PC user that ease of applying/how well paste spreads should be important aspect in recommendation.

Thermal paste reviews don't often go much into viscosity/easy of applying, but Tom's hardware's comparison puts AS5 to below average:
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/thermal-paste-comparison,5108-13.html
MX-4 would be better recommandation in that aspect, besides not having problem risk from AS5 being slightly capacitive.
 
Im still using good old Arctic Silver 5 with the spread technique and take off any excess, so there's no chance of it dripping on stuff.
 
Last edited:
With overall rather small performance difference margin, even the best paste would likely perform well below average, if badly applied.
So for use of average PC user that ease of applying/how well paste spreads should be important aspect in recommendation.

Thermal paste reviews don't often go much into viscosity/easy of applying, but Tom's hardware's comparison puts AS5 to below average:
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/thermal-paste-comparison,5108-13.html
MX-4 would be better recommandation in that aspect, besides not having problem risk from AS5 being slightly capacitive.

Viscosity and in that respect ease of application of AS5 is irrelevant (although due to people and even reviewers persisting in ignoring the application notes they've changed it to be more tolerant of different approaches) if applied as it was originally intended it is as simple as it gets.

If people want to persist in hand spreading use MX-4 (or another paste) which was actually designed for (option 3) hand spreading and will likely produce better results versus AS5 when applied in that manner. AS5 works optimally when not manually spread.
 
Tom's Hardware's monster 85 product round-up from last year:
https://www.tomshardware.co.uk/thermal-paste-comparison,review-33969.html

But pretty much every summary I can find says "it's not what you use, but how you use it" i.e. how you apply it, quantity, etc.

But even then I don't deviate from the "pea size blob" (mainstream CPU) or "8-way star lines" (GPU) and just let the pressure of mounting the cooler spread it out.

Pretty much every video I watch concluded unless you put too little or way way too much on it makes no difference.. I think even way way too much hardly made a difference (it just made a mess).
 
I just used the TIM that came on the stock cooler with my Ryzen, it's good enough, better thermal compound may knock 1C to 2C off temps if applied correctly but I hate doing that ****. It was one of the things that put me off dropping in an ivybridge CPU into my old sandybridge system.

The thought of disassembling my CPU cooler and applying new paste, I wasn't even sure if I had any.
 
Back
Top Bottom