
Matt82 said:just over 8m? i sorta doubt that. have you seen evo's 'sub 8 min' m3?
thatll give you a rough idea of the costs involved.
ive no idea what that supra was worth, didnt really know much about them even back then
Stonedofmoo said:The Supra and the addon technoligy on it are almost 10 years old, of course it won't seem that impressive now
Technoligy moves the goalposts very quickly and its not like the Supra is a new car either.

housemaster said:.... or buy a Radical and go for something in the 6's


Tax Evader said:I couldn't be bothered to watch the whole video (having trouble with the commentators accent), but I take it the 7m49s is for the full Nordschleife - rather than the shorter BTG measurement.
[edit] Matt82 - Andres 8.24 (with traffic) was BTG, not full.
Gibbo said:Hi m8
Ah my mistake!
Whats the difference between BTG and full then? When manufacturers and magazine mention lap times are they talking BTG or full?

Gibbo said:When manufacturers and magazine mention lap times are they talking BTG or full?

Gibbo said:Hi there
I understand your point, but even at that time there was cars lapping quicker.
I don't get why people might throw 100k at a car to try and make it go round a track nearly as quick as say a Ferrari or Porsche. By the time you have spent that money modding what was a cheap mass production car you could have purchased the Porsche or Ferrari and had lots of change.
Also technology is not a huge factor, the Corvette Z06 still uses leaf springs yet it can do the ring in close to 7:30 out the factory. It might be a new car but its design is nothing ground breaking, just Corvette sticking with what they know works.
Now a car like the Veyron is a technology leap and as such what has it done the ring in?
housemaster said:The Z06 is quick, but the number of Z06 production cars on the road now being used for tests and not coming up trumps I think shows the Ring time was a bit 'special'...