Associate
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2004
- Posts
- 1,417
- Location
- Finally, Swindon
I disagree. The contract takes precedence. Policy is neither here nor there
The contract isn't being broken if the policy excludes FTC employee's. The companies discretionary decision is that FTC's are not eligible. You can disagree all you like, but you are wrong.I disagree. The contract takes precedence. Policy is neither here nor there
What I say is that this is key part. Forget the "may" part being the key, unless the payout is merit based and you've failed to rerach the minimum target , or whatever. If there is some hurdle to overcome to become eligible, it should have been communicated to you. If it wasn't, they can't withold payment
Stuff what HR say their policies are, your contract overrides anything else
The fact that this is in your contract, implies that it's possible for you to receive an element of Company Profit Bonus Share. I bet you contract also states you are an FTC, so the 2 parts shouldn't be mutually exclusive. If they are, it's the company's problem they've got a poorly worded contract. Your arguement will be it's open to interpretation...your interpretation
If it's awkward to push forward on this, wait until you move on to the next job (with their references under your belt) and then contact them asking for payment
Good luck
<<edit>>
Just because bonus schemes are discretionary, doesn't mean you can be excluded from it at the whim of the company. They have to apply the same criteria to all employees in terms of eligibility and size of payout
Also, many companies say their schemes are discretionary, but if there's a scheme in place and the criteria for payout are met, it's highly unlikely they won't pay it out except in extenuating circumstances eg. sudden and unexpected decline of business before it's paid out
In your case the profit criteria have been met since some staff have been paid out
If the contract says you may be eligible and the policy states FTC aren't eligible then there's the black and white statement that covers the may be eligible term in the contract.
You said yourself if there's a hurdle to overcome to get the bonus it should be communicated, it has in the policy.I disagree. The contract takes precedence. Policy is neither here nor there
Have you made it abundantly clear every time you have asked the question that you are a Fixed Term Contractor?Quick response to all, I will respond more later. I am fully aware that bonuses are discretionary, I’m not disputing that. It’s the somewhat grey area between apparent policy and a contradicting email from HR that’s causing me to seek advice on this.
Have you made it abundantly clear every time you have asked the question that you are a Fixed Term Contractor?
