The benefit to wiring the school with one switch in each room and running one uplink cable to the server room would be that it reduces cable requirements.
It does indeed.
The downside is speed as you would be running all the classroom over 1 uplink to the main stack.
It doesn't help that most of our wireless points that are in classrooms plug into the same 10/100 switches so when iPads get used in certain classrooms, the network speed must just drop so much so as to knacker the network speeds in that room.
The more common way would be to get network ports installed into the floors or walls and run patch cables through the roof or floors and up to a server room. But if the building is listed or does not have under floor space then you are limited to do that.
I would like to do network sockets and run them over the ceilings back to the local network cabinet.
But you should at least have a gigabit uplink from each switch in the classrooms
Unfortunately most, if not all, of the switches in the classrooms will be 10/100 and not 10/100/1000 which I think does limit us a lot.
and have full gigabit switches in the server room racks ideally a cisco switch stack where the bandwidth for the switches is shared across the stack.
Yep, our central network location has 2 Gigabit switches. Unfortunately one switch is only 10/100 and despite some re-arranging today, we still have a few devices plugged into the 10/100 switch.
Then have any servers plugged in to the stack on their own gigabit cables. Depending on how many rooms you could probably get away with 1 cisco 48 port 3750 as a main stack.
For some weird reason, one server is plugged into one cabinet, not the central one, and the other is plugged into the central cabinet. However to access the Internet, the server plugged into the central cabinet (which is our curriculum server, so for all students and most teachers) has to run off to the other cabinet (that the other server plugs into) because on the other side of the wall is our Internet connection cabinet. So any curriculum PC sends packets to the central cabinet location but then has to run off to another cabinet to access the Internet and then back to the central cabinet location again.
We are having a new building put up in the next year or so. Some of our network cabinets will have to move because where they are will be knocked down to make for a larger staff room. We now have to decide where to locate those cabinets and whilst my preferred option, having all both the servers in the central cabinet location, including our Internet cabinet, will cost more, I think it will be the better option. I just have to price up the work for external engineers and persuade my boss that I'm right!
