Simple question.
You are changing the springs on a 60,000 mile car. There is nothing "obviously" wrong with the shocks.
Would you change both springs and shocks, or just the springs?
If you were having the work carried out by a Garage and the Garage recommended changing both, would you see the logic in doing so (Shocks age, everything nice and new is good, doing whole lot in one go incurs little additional labour, just additional parts cost), or would you feel that the garage was trying to pad the job out a bit?
You are changing the springs on a 60,000 mile car. There is nothing "obviously" wrong with the shocks.
Would you change both springs and shocks, or just the springs?
If you were having the work carried out by a Garage and the Garage recommended changing both, would you see the logic in doing so (Shocks age, everything nice and new is good, doing whole lot in one go incurs little additional labour, just additional parts cost), or would you feel that the garage was trying to pad the job out a bit?