Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 13,030
I did no work year 1 and did a half decent amount in year 2 and still ended up with a distinction merit.
I was shocked with the amount of out of date/irrelevent stuff we had to do when I took the Btec Computer Studies. having said that I would go back and take it again just to stick two fingers up at the teachers who said I couldn't.
My Foundation degree had Cisco in, I decided not to do the cisco part, I don't have a massive interest in networking. I'm not even so sure about going into a career with IT now, wether or not this degree will help me get anywhere if I go a different route is unknown.
[TW]Fox;15125177 said:With it being a foundation degree probably not. A conventional degree at least shows an employer your ability to learn at a (comparatively) high level whereas all a foundation degree shows if you dont use it in the field its in is... well, I dunno, that you couldnt get onto a proper degree?
No business cares about whether the network is a token, ring or bus network. What would be more usefull is to teach about DNS records, exchange manager, setting up Servers with Windows Server 2003 or 2007, setting up exchange and domain controllers etc
I'm in my second and last year of my foundation degree and after I can go on to do a 1 year top up degree to turn it into a BSc, but I'm not really sure if I want to do this next year, I want to get a job, just A job to get some money and to show I've done some work.
No, I don't want to do a course next year though, I just want to work. The reason I want to change direction is because I figure if I don't like networking and don't do cisco which I did not do, then there is no job for me in IT as I'm lead to believe all jobs in IT require networking.
our programming lecturer was but 3 pages ahead of us the whole year.I did a BTEC and we were never very happy with the teaching standard of the lecturer to the point where we had him invigilated. The day the invigilator came the lecturer decided to show off his class interaction skills by brining in some part of a car engine for us to look at to help illustrate some something or the other. Tbh it was a nice change but I couldn't see what it had to do with telecommunications. Possibly something to do with magnets.
The invigilator agreed and not too long after we got two new lecturers who were actually pretty awesome.
---
When I was at college I did AS-level history. We had a lecturer who would literally spend whole double lesson periods teaching stuff that wasn't on the syllabus. The thing is this wasn't through blissful ignorance, she would spend hours harping on about something only to say something like "but that's not on the syllabus, it's good background information". She did this pretty much every lecture until we had her invigilated, when she promptly changed her tune, after which nothing really changed. It was bloody ridiculous.
I know you can't blame the lecturer for everything, but she did nothing to help imho.
Not always. A large number of decent payng jobs will have a degree as a pre-requisite, then they'll start looking at experience.
No, not really. As far as I can tell, your software knowledge is far more important. I've lost count of how many times Active Directory and Exchange are mentioned in recruitment for example.
would you go a tatooist that has 2/3years exp with no college corse in it and rep or a newly trained top of school tatooist? I think the exp one will always shine through.
I would go to the tatooist with 2/3 years exp AND the college course.
over a guy with 4/5 years exp?