Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2006
- Posts
- 3,709
I find it odd that people are being kind enough to try and help him but he is very cagey about what he is trying to do.
btw i think flash sucks
LOLWUT?Robbie G said:Flash does not "suck", it is the future.
LOLWUT?
Okay guys,
Then what about this, I could either buy or download a free CSS template which already has the CSS hover effect. Then I could use agoracart which is free open source. Then use paypal. Then add my current logo and header from my current store to the site. Build it using an off the shelf CSS website builder. Add my current products, photos, videos, then host it! Then start with the advertising and wait patiently for a sale. It shouldn't take long as I already got a number of customers. As my current store has been online for a few years.
Okay guys,
Then what about this, I could either buy or download a free CSS template which already has the CSS hover effect. Then I could use agoracart which is free open source. Then use paypal. Then add my current logo and header from my current store to the site. Build it using an off the shelf CSS website builder. Add my current products, photos, videos, then host it! Then start with the advertising and wait patiently for a sale. It shouldn't take long as I already got a number of customers. As my current store has been online for a few years.
Correct me if I'm wrong but the problem with flash is not people being stuck in their ways, google still does not know what's inside your flash website, so all outbound links are not counted, all inner PR structure is nill, keyword density is nill, people cannot search for a phrase that comes up in your site, it is difficult to make a link to a certain frame/page within your flash website (is that even possible without multiple swf?), flash sites are more difficult for users to browse because if it looks different from what they're used to, if it doesn't look different than they're used to then whats the point in using flash?That, is a lovely looking and functioning website. Flash animosity seems to come from those slightly set in their html ways thinking "oh no, how will I cope when the hours I spent learning all this html and css are almost totally negated by something sensible at last coming to the internet table?".
Sometimes, change is a good thing.
Correct me if I'm wrong but the problem with flash is not people being stuck in their ways, google still does not know what's inside your flash website, so all outbound links are not counted, all inner PR structure is nill, keyword density is nill, people cannot search for a phrase that comes up in your site, it is difficult to make a link to a certain frame/page within your flash website (is that even possible without multiple swf?), flash sites are more difficult for users to browse because if it looks different from what they're used to, if it doesn't look different than they're used to then whats the point in using flash?
Flash is not a mature medium for basing a whole website on, if flash does indeed rock, why don't all the major sites use flash? Why is google not flash? Why is't wikipedia flash?
Because the medium is not as viable as HTML and other than looking flashy it offers nothing over HTML at all and is infact stunted.
Flash for now should stick to portfolio/niche sites, or sites where content is not that important.
Correct me if I'm wrong but the problem with flash is not people being stuck in their ways, google still does not know what's inside your flash website, so all outbound links are not counted, all inner PR structure is nill, keyword density is nill, people cannot search for a phrase that comes up in your site, it is difficult to make a link to a certain frame/page within your flash website (is that even possible without multiple swf?), flash sites are more difficult for users to browse because if it looks different from what they're used to, if it doesn't look different than they're used to then whats the point in using flash?
Flash is not a mature medium for basing a whole website on, if flash does indeed rock, why don't all the major sites use flash? Why is google not flash? Why is't wikipedia flash?
Because the medium is not as viable as HTML and other than looking flashy it offers nothing over HTML at all and is infact stunted.
Flash for now should stick to portfolio/niche sites, or sites where content is not that important.
Correct me if I'm wrong but the problem with flash is not people being stuck in their ways, google still does not know what's inside your flash website, so all outbound links are not counted, all inner PR structure is nill, keyword density is nill, people cannot search for a phrase that comes up in your site, it is difficult to make a link to a certain frame/page within your flash website (is that even possible without multiple swf?)
flash sites are more difficult for users to browse because if it looks different from what they're used to, if it doesn't look different than they're used to then whats the point in using flash?
Flash is not a mature medium for basing a whole website on, if flash does indeed rock, why don't all the major sites use flash? Why is google not flash? Why is't wikipedia flash?
Because the medium is not as viable as HTML and other than looking flashy it offers nothing over HTML at all and is infact stunted.
Flash for now should stick to portfolio/niche sites, or sites where content is not that important.
Depends what you mean by content. Go to the http://www.empireonline.com, which utilises Flash heavily,
Thanks, that's quite recent, I must have msised it.It does check some content from within the flash file, but does still ignore some stuff. see here
I'm not sure what you mean by this.Flash sites can be targeted by search engines by embedding html versions in the site
But that's a website with flash on it, not a flash website.Go to http://www.empireonline.com, which utilises Flash heavily.
What I mean to say is that the majority of websites out there designed entirely in flash either look the same as regular websites with animation added on, or they look really different confusing the user, users like things to be predictable. If it looks the same with animation the benefit to the user is negligible, maybe it#s because I come from the function > style way of thinking, I try to use as few images as possible in pages nevermind flash =/I'm not sure I agree with this point since flash websites are hardly so different looking that they'll make someone immediately click away or make it harder for them to operate. It's still click-the-link isn't it after all, not exactly complicated. Most people would surely think "wow what a fancy site" rather than "run for the hills, this website is moving!".
But that's the issue right there, in general it does not enhance the user experience for 99% of websites.No, but it will be. And Google and Wiki hardly require intensive multimedia functionality; they're heavily word-based websites. And it's not just about looking flashy, it's about offering an enhanced user experience and adding interest through visual stimulus.