Wingman just one last question - do you actually have a driving licence or in fact a car and I don't mean one on "need for speed"
Oh no, you caught me out!
Wingman just one last question - do you actually have a driving licence or in fact a car and I don't mean one on "need for speed"
You need to reassess and accept that you are wrong.
That rubbish you've just written isn't even remotely amusing.
Hopefully I won't encounter you on the road as it sounds like you don't know how to drive. Unless you seriously think you have some entitlement to overtake no matter how dangerous it might be or to kill people for getting in your way.
It's counter productive only to the driver originally breaking the law by overtaking.
Overtaking isn't against the law. Blocking them from overtaking is.
If you're desperate to stop the pesky "boy racers" from "speeding" then join the police and stop them legally. If you don't have the conviction to do that then you're just moronic ****. Or a troll.
I keep to the speed limit, therefore people overtaking me are breaking the speed limit to do so. I have been exceptionally clear on this point.
Blocking them from overtaking is not against the law, although it could be held against me in a court of law, is not breaking the law in itself.
So if you are driving at the speed limit and someone overtakes you, you will break the law to stop them breaking the law?
And in response to the second part of my post?
So if you are driving at the speed limit and someone overtakes you, you will break the law to stop them breaking the law?
Blocking them from overtaking is not against the law, although it could be held against me in a court of law, is not breaking the law in itself.
I decided to ignore your unkind words.
What gives you the right to police the roads, if you are not an officer of law?
However it is contrary to the highway code![]()
Blocking them from overtaking is not against the law, although it could be held against me in a court of law, is not breaking the law in itself.