Hi All
Just a quick question about image quality.
I wont to get my sky going from downstairs to my new 40" LCD. And I was just wondering if someone could tell me which one of these is the best way to do it...
Either bye the skyfunk SL3 audio video sender and a sky remote and do it wirelessly?
Or bye a sky magic eye with remote and some coaxial cable with 2 male connectors and connect it from the eye to the skybox via the second RF input?
Which one of these will provide better quality? I think it will be the wires why but I have read the video sender is good. And doing the cables is a lot more workdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
Thanks
XD-3
Just a quick question about image quality.
I wont to get my sky going from downstairs to my new 40" LCD. And I was just wondering if someone could tell me which one of these is the best way to do it...
Either bye the skyfunk SL3 audio video sender and a sky remote and do it wirelessly?
Or bye a sky magic eye with remote and some coaxial cable with 2 male connectors and connect it from the eye to the skybox via the second RF input?
Which one of these will provide better quality? I think it will be the wires why but I have read the video sender is good. And doing the cables is a lot more work
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
Thanks
XD-3