Calculating the focal length required for a moon shot

Associate
Joined
1 Aug 2007
Posts
1,052
Time for some maths...

Here the the question:

What focal length of lens is required to produce a full frame image of the moon?

I want to produce am image like this:

36x24moon.jpg


Where the diameter of the moon projected on my full frame sensor is 24mm.

Clearly, we need to know the anglular size of the moon. The Wiki tells us...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_diameter

It varies. 29.3′ – 34.1'

That's 29.3 to 34.1 minutes. Sixty minutes in a degree.

We'll make it easy and call it half a degree.

Next, we need to be able to calculate the vertical field of view from any given lens.

For this purpose, I think that we can consider a pin-hole lens. I'll draw a diagram for a 100mm pin hole:

100mm-pin-hole.gif


The 7.1 degrees shown is for half the image. The full (vertical) angle of view would be double that, 14.2 degrees.

The angle (x) is calculated with trig:

tan(x) = 12.5/100
x = atan(12.5/100)
x = 7.125 degrees

(don't forget to double it...)

Now, lets check that against Canon's reference:

http://web.canon.jp/imaging/l-lens/spec/lens_spec.html

The vertical angle of view on the 100-400 starts at 14 degrees, against the 14.25 that I predict.

Let check again on the 800mmm

tan(x) = 12.5/800
x = atan(0.015625)
x = 0.89 degrees

Double it to 1.79 degrees.

Which is 1 degree 47 minutes. Canon say 1 degree 40 minutes. Close enough.

So, we weem to be on the right track.

Turn it round and ask what is the focal length for 0.5 degrees?

tan(0.5) = 12.5/x
tan(0.5) * x = 12.5
x = 12.5/tan(0.5)
x = 1432mm

So, I need a 1432mm lens.

An 800 with 1.4x come close at 1120mm and would autofocus on a 1D body.

An 800 with a 2x would crop the moon.

Can someone give me an 800mm f5.6 so that I can check? :-)

Andrew
 
Nope. I only have FF. My calcs are based on the 24mm height of a FF.

And the exif on V-spec's images say that likewise he is using his 1dsIII

Andrew

Well the exif for the first photo says 1200mm so maybe thats ok.

Or perhaps its not registering it correctly.

sid
 
Well the exif for the first photo says 1200mm so maybe thats ok.

Or perhaps its not registering it correctly.

sid

Correct, with Canon it only registers a single teleconverter, 2x goes on first - it doesn't see the 1.4x

How on earth (no pun intended lol) did you manage that? Its fantastic!!

What equipment did you use?

Cheers lol,

Quite simply, thousands of pounds worth of kit, precise manual focussing at 5x and 10x liveview, rigid tripod and head and a very clear night!

Cracking images.

By my calculation, at 1600mm it should be cropped, so I must have slipped up somewhere...

Andrew

your not far off, although I can't remember whether that first shot was full frame or slightly cropped.
 
Last edited:
your not far off, although I can't remember whether that first shot was full frame or slightly cropped.

I think he means in terms of framing the shot, the moon should have been cropped. In the first picture theres plenty of black around the moon so it clearly isn't the case

sid
 
Back
Top Bottom