In what way does it cause misery for millions? That's complete crap.
I guess it can be argued the hardware soley purchased & used for cryptocurrency mining will contribut heavily to the landfill problem in developing countries.
In what way does it cause misery for millions? That's complete crap.
That would be a fairly weak argument though.I guess it can be argued the hardware soley purchased & used for cryptocurrency mining will contribut heavily to the landfill problem in developing countries.
diamonds are worse than gold and almost uselessIt's only useless because it's so valuable and costs too much to use.
It's a good conductor of electricity, it doesn't corrode, it doesn't react with many other things, it doesn't need much processing (it's mined in raw form, not an ore or something).
If it lost all the value we attach to it, it'd probably have thousands of other uses.
it did spike the price of GPUs for years and that's probably one of the reasons GPUs are soo expensive today.In what way does it cause misery for millions? That's complete crap.
Well then. I seemed to have ruffled a few feathers here. Once the pandemic is over, can I come to your home and use your gold toilet?
If that was true then the government couldn't magic money out of thin air such as the billions of pounds they have created over the pandemic. The economy is in dire straits yet more money has been created, not less.The complete answer to this question would be very complex and I'm not going to pretend I could do it justice, but ultimately Sterling is based upon the economic output of the U.K. and the percieved ability of the U.K. to pay it's debts. I can see no such support for Bitcoin and to me at least, it gives every appearance of being a bubble. A lot of people are going to make a lot of money off it in the coming months but a lot more are going to burned (In my opinion)
Heavy fines for anyone caught using a cryptocurrency, that should sort it.
If that was true then the government couldn't magic money out of thin air such as the billions of pounds they have created over the pandemic. The economy is in dire straits yet more money has been created, not less.
Can see the environmental impact of mining becoming a factor soon, doesn't mining already account for more electricity use than some small countries?
I have no issue with cryptocurrency in principle and it has proved useful for me many times.
If that was true then the government couldn't magic money out of thin air such as the billions of pounds they have created over the pandemic. The economy is in dire straits yet more money has been created, not less.
You could argue that electricity and fuel usage to create shows like love island are also a complete waste of resources.
So should they also be banned?
As for crypto it would help if op had a clue. Nobody mines bitcoin on a gpu any more. In fact gpu mining isn't even profitable. Unless you are getting the GPU and electricity for free then all the other parts on top.
You could argue that electricity and fuel usage to create shows like love island are also a complete waste of resources.
So should they also be banned?
I haven't suggested that anything should be banned !
I am just predicting a time when we may seem some form of legislation designed (poorly probably) to regulate high power consumption that comes from running large mining farms.
If it was working then people wouldn't be desperate to sell it for tangible currency everytime that some people manipulate it to a high point to sell.
Economics is mind-blowingly stupid if you step back and examine it.
What do you think "real" currency is based on? Britain left the Gold Standard in 1931. Since then what do you think sterling is based on?
EDIT: In fact take a look at an actual sterling note (e.g. a £5). It is a promissory note rather than actual currency. It states "I promise to pay the bearer on demand". If you went to the Bank of England and asked to cash in that note for actual currency what do you think they would give you in exchange?